1519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26906171)
41. The improved bioactive n-HA/PA66 cage versus the PEEK cage in anterior cervical fusion: results from a 6-year follow-up and a case-matched study.
Deng Z; Hu B; Yang X; Wang L; Song Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1113. PubMed ID: 36544134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Yson SC; Sembrano JN; Santos ER
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 38():118-121. PubMed ID: 28153602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Ju J; Wu J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jun; 18(1):403. PubMed ID: 37269002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.
Nemoto O; Kitada A; Naitou S; Tachibana A; Ito Y; Fujikawa A
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 25283362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the clinical and radiologic outcomes obtained with single- versus two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion using stand-alone PEEK cages filled with allograft.
Choi MK; Kim SB; Park CK; Kim SM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Mar; 158(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 26758609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical and radiological outcomes of non-window-type bioactive glass-ceramic cage in single-level ACDF versus PEEK cage filled with autologous bone.
Kwon JW; Lee YH; Lee BH; Kim JH; Suk KS
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4035. PubMed ID: 38369553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion.
Song KJ; Taghavi CE; Lee KB; Song JH; Eun JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2886-92. PubMed ID: 19949367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plate in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: clinical outcomes and radiologic changes.
Oh JK; Kim TY; Lee HS; You NK; Choi GH; Yi S; Ha Y; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Shin HC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Dec; 26(8):415-20. PubMed ID: 22367466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of radiological outcomes and complications between single-level and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage-plate fusion system.
Lee HC; Chen CH; Wu CY; Guo JH; Chen YS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(5):e14277. PubMed ID: 30702590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Stand-alone Cervical Cages Versus Anterior Cervical Plates in 2-Level Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Patients: Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
Ji GY; Oh CH; Shin DA; Ha Y; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Yudoyono F
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Aug; 28(7):E433-8. PubMed ID: 23897053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Anterior corpectomy with iliac bone fusion or discectomy with interbody titanium cage fusion for multilevel cervical degenerated disc disease.
Hwang SL; Lee KS; Su YF; Kuo TH; Lieu AS; Lin CL; Howng SL; Hwang YF
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Dec; 20(8):565-70. PubMed ID: 18046168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term.
Pereira EA; Chari A; Hempenstall J; Leach JC; Chandran H; Cadoux-Hudson TA
J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 20(9):1250-5. PubMed ID: 23890411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparing the Bridge-Type Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with Plating and Cage System in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
He S; Zhou Z; Shao X; Zhou L; Zhang C; Zhou X; Wu S; Chen K; Wang Y; Qian Z
Orthop Surg; 2022 Jun; 14(6):1100-1108. PubMed ID: 35478487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Anterior cervical fusion: a comparison of cage, dowel and dowel-plate constructs.
Cauthen JC; Theis RP; Allen AT
Spine J; 2003; 3(2):106-17; discussion 117. PubMed ID: 14589223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Miao J; Shen Y; Kuang Y; Yang L; Wang X; Chen Y; Chen D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jul; 26(5):E193-7. PubMed ID: 23168389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical and radiological results comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone cage for one to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A CONSORT-compliant article.
Yang S; Yu Y; Liu X; Zhang Z; Hou T; Xu J; Wu W; Luo F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(45):e17935. PubMed ID: 31702680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients.
Lu DC; Tumialán LM; Chou D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23157278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for the treatment of the single and multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease.
Li Z; Wang H; Li L; Tang J; Ren D; Hou S
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():115-122. PubMed ID: 28262396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a cage alone or combined with anterior plate fixation.
Pinder EM; Sharp DJ
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Apr; 24(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 27122522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Fate of Adjacent Segments After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Influence of an Anterior Plate System.
Ahn SS; Paik HK; Chin DK; Kim SH; Kim DW; Ku MG
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():42-50. PubMed ID: 26828457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
