161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26906183)
1. Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Porter AC; Triebwasser JE; Tuuli M; Caughey AB; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(8):786-90. PubMed ID: 26906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.
Cahill AG; Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; López JD; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):523.e1-523.e12. PubMed ID: 29408586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring features associated with a clinical diagnosis of nonreassuring fetal status.
Rimsza RR; Frolova AI; Kelly JC; Carter EB; Cahill AG; Raghuraman N
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Sep; 5(9):101068. PubMed ID: 37380056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Terminal fetal heart decelerations and neonatal outcomes.
Cahill AG; Caughey AB; Roehl KA; Odibo AO; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 122(5):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 24104779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electronic fetal monitoring patterns associated with respiratory morbidity in term neonates.
Liu L; Tuuli MG; Roehl KA; Odibo AO; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):681.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26193688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association Between Intrapartum Cardiotocogram and Early Neonatal Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand.
Amsumang S; Wuttikonsammakit P; Chamnan P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Apr; 100(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 29911805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of Fetal Heart Rate Baseline Change and Neonatal Outcomes.
Yang M; Stout MJ; López JD; Colvin R; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2017 Jul; 34(9):879-886. PubMed ID: 28301895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Growth Restriction on Fetal Heart Rate Patterns in the Second Stage of Labor.
Epplin KA; Tuuli MG; Odibo AO; Roehl KA; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Jul; 32(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 25607225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical decelerations: do they matter?
Martí Gamboa S; Pascual Mancho J; Lapresta Moros M; Rodríguez Lázaro L; de Bonrostro Torralba C; Castán Mateo S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(2):240-244. PubMed ID: 27003711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deceleration area of fetal heart rate trace and fetal acidemia at delivery: a case-control study.
Giannubilo SR; Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Palla GP; Tranquilli AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Feb; 20(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 17437212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Correlation between Fetal Monitor Decelerations Area and Neonatal Cord pH among Preeclamptic parturient: an Automated Approach to a Clinical Challenge.
Rotem R; Theodor E; Hirsch A; Rottenstreich M; Salem SY; Weintraub AY
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e3133-e3139. PubMed ID: 37871640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonreassuring Fetal Status in the Second Stage of Labor: Fetal Monitoring Features and Association with Neonatal Outcomes.
Triebwasser JE; Colvin R; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jun; 33(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 26862724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between maternal anemia and electronic fetal monitoring patterns.
Beermann SE; Watkins VY; Frolova AI; Raghuraman N; Cahill AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):449.e1-449.e6. PubMed ID: 37086877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of intrapartum oxygen supplementation on category II fetal monitoring.
Raghuraman N; López JD; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Macones GA; Tuuli MG; Cahill AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):905.e1-905.e7. PubMed ID: 32585226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal and quantitative associations of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring patterns and neonatal outcomes
Ogunyemi D; Jovanovski A; Friedman P; Sweatman B; Madan I
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Sep; 32(18):3115-3124. PubMed ID: 29621921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. True knot at the time of delivery: electronic fetal monitoring characteristics and neonatal outcomes.
Carter EB; Chu CS; Thompson Z; Tuuli MG; Macones GA; Cahill AG
J Perinatol; 2018 Dec; 38(12):1620-1624. PubMed ID: 30323323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The correlation between total deceleration and acceleration surface areas on electronic fetal monitoring and neonatal cord blood pH in postdate pregnancies.
Talmor M; Rotem R; Wientraub AY; Yaniv Salem S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):870-876. PubMed ID: 36333868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is intrapartum vibroacoustic stimulation an effective predictor of fetal acidosis?
Lin CC; Vassallo B; Mittendorf R
J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 11776681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of late-second-trimester nonstress test characteristics between small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age infants.
Yanagihara T; Hata T
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 94(6):921-4. PubMed ID: 10576176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
