162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26906328)
1. Predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement in surgically resected rectal cancer: A retrospective review of 23,464 patients in the US National Cancer Database.
Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Gabriel E; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Apr; 28():112-7. PubMed ID: 26906328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term prognostic value of mesorectal grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Madbouly KM; Hussein AM; Abdelzaher E
Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 24581995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients.
Keskin M; Bayraktar A; Sivirikoz E; Yegen G; Karip B; Saglam E; Bulut MT; Balik E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(5):e2669. PubMed ID: 26844498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
Hiranyakas A; da Silva G; Wexner SD; Ho YH; Allende D; Berho M
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Park JS; Huh JW; Park YA; Cho YB; Yun SH; Kim HC; Lee WY; Chun HK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Aug; 57(8):933-40. PubMed ID: 25003288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer].
Alecha JS; Ribera EB; Dorronsoro M; Ripa CZ; Cabezón JH; Tricas JM
Cir Esp; 2007 Jan; 81(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17263953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in circumferential resection margin: Reporting and involvement in the South-Netherlands.
Homan J; Bökkerink GM; Aarts MJ; Lemmens VE; van Lijnschoten G; Rutten HJ; Wijsman JH; Nagtegaal ID; de Wilt JH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1485-92. PubMed ID: 26251342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
Birbeck KF; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons W; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Abbott CR; Scott N; Finan PJ; Johnston D; Quirke P
Ann Surg; 2002 Apr; 235(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 11923599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of the positive pathologic circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: A national cancer database (NCDB) study.
Reif de Paula T; Augestad KM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 32800594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Standardized examination and research advancement of circumferential resection margin in patients with middle-lower rectal cancer].
Gu J; Wang L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 14(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 21538262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.
Marr R; Birbeck K; Garvican J; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons WJ; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Sebag-Montefiore D; Scott N; Johnston D; Sagar P; Finan P; Quirke P
Ann Surg; 2005 Jul; 242(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 15973104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery.
Dardanov D; Betova T; Deliyski T
J BUON; 2007; 12(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 17918291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?
Kang BM; Park YK; Park SJ; Lee KY; Kim CW; Lee SH
Asian J Surg; 2018 May; 41(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 28118954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CEA - a predictor for pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.
Wallin U; Rothenberger D; Lowry A; Luepker R; Mellgren A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jul; 56(7):859-68. PubMed ID: 23739192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Circumferential Resection Margin as a Hospital Quality Assessment Tool for Rectal Cancer Surgery.
Patel SH; Hu CY; Massarweh NN; You YN; McCabe R; Dietz D; Facktor MA; Chang GJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Jun; 230(6):1008-1018.e5. PubMed ID: 32142927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
