BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26906351)

  • 21. [Retrospective study of 184 superior pedicle breast reductions without drainage].
    Gahagnon T; Guerreschi P; Calibre C; Martinot-Duquennoy V
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Oct; 40(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 21775072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vertical reduction mammaplasty combined with a superomedial pedicle in gigantomastia.
    Amini P; Stasch T; Theodorou P; Altintas AA; Phan V; Spilker G
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Mar; 64(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 20179473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures.
    Manahan MA; Buretta KJ; Chang D; Mithani SK; Mallalieu J; Shermak MA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Mar; 74(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 25668497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified?
    Setälä L; Papp A; Joukainen S; Martikainen R; Berg L; Mustonen P; Härmä M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Feb; 62(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 18039601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The vertical reduction mammaplasty: a prospective analysis of patient outcomes.
    Spector JA; Kleinerman R; Culliford AT; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Feb; 117(2):374-81; discussion 382-3. PubMed ID: 16462315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are Surgical Approaches Correlated With BREAST-Q Score Improvements After Reduction Mammoplasty? A Systematic Review.
    Liao CD; Xia J; Zhao K; Wang K; Glickman LT; Agrawal NA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 5):S659-S666. PubMed ID: 36913563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Superomedial Pedicle Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Breast Symmetry and Aesthetics.
    Ron O; Inbal A; Arad E; Zaretski A; Leshem D; Yanko R; Gur E; Barnea Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 42(3):639-647. PubMed ID: 29218474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The central pillar technique: a new septum-based pedicle design for reduction mammaplasty.
    Bayramiçli M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Jul; 32(5):578-90. PubMed ID: 22745447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Reduction mammaplasty with superomedial pedicle technique: A literature review and retrospective analysis of 938 consecutive breast reductions".
    Bauermeister AJ; Gill K; Zuriarrain A; Earle SA; Newman MI
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Mar; 72(3):410-418. PubMed ID: 30579911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multi-institutional perspective of complication rates for elective nonreconstructive breast surgery: an analysis of NSQIP data from 2006 to 2010.
    Hanwright PJ; Hirsch EM; Seth AK; Chow G; Smetona J; McNichols C; Gaido JA; Fine NA; Bilimoria KY; Kim JY
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Mar; 33(3):378-86. PubMed ID: 23439062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How Does Reduction Mammaplasty Surgical Technique Impact Clinical, Aesthetic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes?: A Comparison of the Superomedial and Inferior Pedicle Techniques.
    Cunning JR; Mookerjee VG; Alper DP; Rios-Diaz AJ; Bauder AR; Kimia R; Broach RB; Barrette LX; Fischer JP; Butler PD
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jul; 91(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 37450858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefits and pitfalls of vertical scar breast reduction.
    Beer GM; Spicher I; Cierpka KA; Meyer VE
    Br J Plast Surg; 2004 Jan; 57(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 14672673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty.
    Hamdi M; Greuse M; De Mey A; Webster MH
    Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 54(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11121316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Reduction mammaplasty in breast hypertrophy].
    Sandsmark M; Amland PF; Abyholm F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(15):1945-9. PubMed ID: 1509452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing reduction mammaplasty specimens between superior and central pedicle techniques: a retrospective study.
    Sivrioglu N; Irkoren S; Soyder A; Özgün H; Erkus M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2013 Jul; 22(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 23222410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method to select patients for vertical scar or inverted-T pattern breast reduction.
    Dex EA; Asplund O; Ardehali B; Eccles SJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1294-302. PubMed ID: 18024253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient satisfaction with vertical reduction mammaplasty: Part I.
    Adham M; Sawan K; Lovelace C; Zakhary J; Adham C
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010; 30(6):814-20. PubMed ID: 21131455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inverted-T versus vertical scar breast reduction: one surgeon's 5-year experience with consecutive patients.
    Zoumaras J; Lawrence J
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(5):521-6; discussion 526-7. PubMed ID: 19083573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simplifying the vertical reduction mammaplasty.
    Chen CM; White C; Warren SM; Cole J; Isik FF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jan; 113(1):162-72; discussion 173-4. PubMed ID: 14707634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast reduction with a superomedial pedicle and a vertical scar (Hall-Findlay's technique): experience with 210 consecutive patients.
    Serra MP; Longhi P; Sinha M
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Mar; 64(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 20179472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.