These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26906596)

  • 1. Efficient reconstruction method for ground layer adaptive optics with mixed natural and laser guide stars.
    Wagner R; Helin T; Obereder A; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2016 Feb; 55(6):1421-9. PubMed ID: 26906596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast iterative tomographic wavefront estimation with recursive Toeplitz reconstructor structure for large-scale systems.
    Ono YH; Correia C; Conan R; Blanco L; Neichel B; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Aug; 35(8):1330-1345. PubMed ID: 30110295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal reconstruction for closed-loop ground-layer adaptive optics with elongated spots.
    Béchet C; Tallon M; Tallon-Bosc I; Thiébaut É; Le Louarn M; Clare RM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A1-8. PubMed ID: 21045872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laser guide star wavefront sensing for ground-layer adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes.
    Clare RM; Le Louarn M; Béchet C
    Appl Opt; 2011 Feb; 50(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 21283238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element-wavelet hybrid algorithm for atmospheric tomography.
    Yudytskiy M; Helin T; Ramlau R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Mar; 31(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24690653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast computation of an optimal controller for large-scale adaptive optics.
    Massioni P; Kulcsár C; Raynaud HF; Conan JM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Nov; 28(11):2298-309. PubMed ID: 22048298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A76-83. PubMed ID: 21045893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance comparison of wavefront reconstruction and control algorithms for Extremely Large Telescopes.
    Montilla I; Béchet C; Le Louarn M; Reyes M; Tallon M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A9-18. PubMed ID: 21045895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational performance comparison of wavefront reconstruction algorithms for the European Extremely Large Telescope on multi-CPU architecture.
    Feng L; Fedrigo E; Béchet C; Brunner E; Pirani W
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jun; 51(16):3564-83. PubMed ID: 22695596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bringing the visible universe into focus with Robo-AO.
    Baranec C; Riddle R; Law NM; Ramaprakash AN; Tendulkar SP; Bui K; Burse MP; Chordia P; Das HK; Davis JT; Dekany RG; Kasliwal MM; Kulkarni SR; Morton TD; Ofek EO; Punnadi S
    J Vis Exp; 2013 Feb; (72):. PubMed ID: 23426078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging performance analysis of adaptive optical telescopes using laser guide stars.
    Welsh BM
    Appl Opt; 1991 Dec; 30(34):5021-30. PubMed ID: 20717316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of methods for the reduction of reconstructed layers in atmospheric tomography.
    Saxenhuber D; Auzinger G; Louarn ML; Helin T
    Appl Opt; 2017 Apr; 56(10):2621-2629. PubMed ID: 28375221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes.
    Ellerbroek BL; Gilles L; Vogel CR
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4811-8. PubMed ID: 12952324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi time-step wavefront reconstruction for tomographic adaptive-optics systems.
    Ono YH; Akiyama M; Oya S; Lardiére O; Andersen DR; Correia C; Jackson K; Bradley C
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Apr; 33(4):726-40. PubMed ID: 27140785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concept, modeling, and performance prediction of a low-cost, large deformable mirror.
    Heimsten R; MacMynowski DG; Andersen T; Owner-Petersen M
    Appl Opt; 2012 Feb; 51(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 22330282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active optics, adaptive optics, and laser guide stars.
    Hubin N; Noethe L
    Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5138):1390-4. PubMed ID: 17736819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive-optics performance of Antarctic telescopes.
    Lawrence JS
    Appl Opt; 2004 Feb; 43(6):1435-49. PubMed ID: 15008551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LSPV+7, a branch-point-tolerant reconstructor for strong turbulence adaptive optics.
    Steinbock MJ; Hyde MW; Schmidt JD
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jun; 53(18):3821-31. PubMed ID: 24979411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative Reconstructor: fast wavefront reconstruction algorithm for Extremely Large Telescopes.
    Rosensteiner M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2132-8. PubMed ID: 21979519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tomography approach for multi-object adaptive optics.
    Vidal F; Gendron E; Rousset G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A253-64. PubMed ID: 21045886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.