BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26906696)

  • 1. Quantifying volume reduction and peak flow mitigation for three bioretention cells in clay soils in northeast Ohio.
    Winston RJ; Dorsey JD; Hunt WF
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 May; 553():83-95. PubMed ID: 26906696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrologic and water quality performance of permeable pavement with internal water storage over a clay soil in Durham, North Carolina.
    Braswell AS; Winston RJ; Hunt WF
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 224():277-287. PubMed ID: 30055460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrology and rainfall runoff pollutant removal performance of biochar-amended bioretention facilities based on field-scale experiments in lateritic red soil regions.
    Mai Y; Huang G
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 761():143252. PubMed ID: 33183819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An event-based hydrologic simulation model for bioretention systems.
    Roy-Poirier A; Filion Y; Champagne P
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(9):1524-33. PubMed ID: 26524443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydrologic performance of bioretention in an expressway service area.
    Gao J; Pan J; Hu N; Xie C
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Apr; 77(7-8):1829-1837. PubMed ID: 29676740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the effects of low-impact development practices under different rainy types: case of Fuxing Island Park, Shanghai, China.
    Wang HW; Zhai YJ; Wei YY; Mao YF
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6706-6716. PubMed ID: 30632038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical evaluation of bioretention system for hydrologic performance.
    Li ZY; Lam KM
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(11):1742-9. PubMed ID: 26038941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A case in subtropical climate city: Assessing the bioretention hydraulic performance on storm in response to poor permeability soil.
    Huang J; Yu Z; Qin Y; Wang L; Huang Y; Huang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 293():112952. PubMed ID: 34102494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving bioretention/biofiltration performance with restorative maintenance.
    Brown RA; Hunt WF
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 22233916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hydrological modeling and field validation of a bioretention basin.
    Wang J; Chua LHC; Shanahan P
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 240():149-159. PubMed ID: 30933819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The pollution removal and stormwater reduction performance of street-side bioretention basins after ten years in operation.
    Lucke T; Nichols PWB
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():784-792. PubMed ID: 26254078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design and hydraulic characteristics of a field-scale bi-phasic bioretention rain garden system for storm water management.
    Yang H; Florence DC; McCoy EL; Dick WA; Grewal PS
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1863-72. PubMed ID: 19448324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydrologic and soil properties of mature bioretention cells in Ontario, Canada.
    Spraakman S; Drake JAP
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 84(12):3541-3560. PubMed ID: 34928825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioretention performance under different rainfall regimes in subtropical conditions: A case study in São Carlos, Brazil.
    Batalini de Macedo M; Ambrogi Ferreira do Lago C; Mendiondo EM; Giacomoni MH
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 248():109266. PubMed ID: 31330273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance characterisation of a stormwater treatment bioretention basin.
    Mangangka IR; Liu A; Egodawatta P; Goonetilleke A
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():173-178. PubMed ID: 25490107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioretention planter performance measured by lag and capture.
    Nissen KA; Borst M; Fassman-Beck E
    Hydrol Process; 2020 Dec; 34(25):5176-5184. PubMed ID: 33627939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodology to simulate unsaturated zone hydrology in Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) for green infrastructure design and evaluation.
    Tu MC; Wadzuk B; Traver R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235528. PubMed ID: 32628703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the effectiveness of management practices on hydrology and water quality at watershed scale with a rainfall-runoff model.
    Liu Y; Bralts VF; Engel BA
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():298-308. PubMed ID: 25553544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing bioretention designs with and without an internal water storage layer for treating highway runoff.
    Li MH; Swapp M; Kim MH; Chu KH; Sung CY
    Water Environ Res; 2014 May; 86(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 24961065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of applying existing bioretention sizing methods to cold climates with snow storage conditions.
    Muthanna TM; Viklander M; Thorolfsson ST
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):73-81. PubMed ID: 18048979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.