These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26907188)

  • 61. The Pap test and Bethesda 2014.
    Nayar R; Wilbur DC
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 May; 123(5):271-81. PubMed ID: 25931431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Randomised study shows that repeated self-sampling and HPV test has more than two-fold higher detection rate of women with CIN2+ histology than Pap smear cytology.
    Gustavsson I; Aarnio R; Berggrund M; Hedlund-Lindberg J; Strand AS; Sanner K; Wikström I; Enroth S; Olovsson M; Gyllensten U
    Br J Cancer; 2018 Mar; 118(6):896-904. PubMed ID: 29438367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].
    Horn LC; Klostermann K
    Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32 Suppl 2():242-54. PubMed ID: 21909794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Markers of Angiogenesis, Lymphangiogenesis, and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (Plasticity) in CIN and Early Invasive Carcinoma of the Cervix: Exploring Putative Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Early Tumor Invasion.
    Kurmyshkina O; Kovchur P; Schegoleva L; Volkova T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 32899940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
    Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Can we predict histological outcome of distinctive cohorts of patients with glandular cell abnormalities on ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing based on human papillomavirus status, age, and associated squamous abnormalities?
    Harbhajanka A; Dahoud W; Michael CW
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1028-1036. PubMed ID: 31359607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), cervical cancer incidence and screening uptake: differences among Northern, Central and Southern Italy].
    Giorgi Rossi P; Chini F; Borgia P; Guasticchi G; Carozzi FM; Confortini M; Angeloni C; Buzzoni C; Buonaguro FM;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 22706361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. p16INK4A as a marker for cervical dyskaryosis: CIN and cGIN in cervical biopsies and ThinPrep smears.
    Murphy N; Ring M; Killalea AG; Uhlmann V; O'Donovan M; Mulcahy F; Turner M; McGuinness E; Griffin M; Martin C; Sheils O; O'Leary JJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 56(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12499437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Pap smear screening results for Turkish pregnant women.
    Dinc A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(11):5835-8. PubMed ID: 23317265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program.
    Gage JC; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Katki HA; Cheung LC; Cuzick J; Myers O; Castle PE; Wheeler CM;
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jan; 25(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 26518316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Application of the CellDetect® staining technique in diagnosis of human cervical cancer.
    He S; Wang GL; Zhu YY; Wu MH; Ji ZG; Seng J; Ji Y; Zhou JM; Chen L
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 24361533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Assessment of cervical cytological data in Albanian females.
    Filipi K; Xhani A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):2129-32. PubMed ID: 24716945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison.
    Mostafa MG; Srivannaboon S; Rachanawutanon M
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
    Maclean AB
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):433-4. PubMed ID: 20604640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
    Al-Rayyan E; Rashed M; Maaita M; Qudah S; Taso O; Haddadin W
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Atypical glandular cells and adenocarcinoma in situ according to the Bethesda 2001 classification: cytohistological correlation and clinical implications.
    Westin MC; Derchain SF; Rabelo-Santos SH; Angelo-Andrade LA; Sarian LO; Oliveira E; Zeferino LC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jul; 139(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 17933453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluation of smears obtained by cervical scraping and an endocervical swab in the diagnosis of neoplastic disease of the uterine cervix.
    Johansen P; Arffmann E; Pallesen G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Histopathologic extent of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 lesions in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study: implications for subject safety and lead-time bias.
    Sherman ME; Wang SS; Tarone R; Rich L; Schiffman M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Apr; 12(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 12692113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Atypical glandular cells diagnosed during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a retrospective analysis.
    Tam KF; Cheung AN; Szeto E; Ngan HY
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Apr; 155(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 21227567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women: a comparative retrospective analysis.
    Goksedef BP; Akbayir O; Baran SY; Turan GY; Batmaz GK; Guraslan H; Corbacioglu A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):418-21. PubMed ID: 21824711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.