512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26907794)
1. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.
Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment.
Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
St-Laurent A; Mony MM; Mathieu MÈ; Ruchat SM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical activity among children: objective measurements using Fitbit One
Hamari L; Kullberg T; Ruohonen J; Heinonen OJ; Díaz-Rodríguez N; Lilius J; Pakarinen A; Myllymäki A; Leppänen V; Salanterä S
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):161. PubMed ID: 28427441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.
Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Different Physical Activity Measures in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Prospective Study.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Alabdulaali M; Neubeck L; Smith S; Naismith S; Jeon YH; Tofler G; Surour A; Gallagher R
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling Clinically Validated Physical Activity Assessments Using Commodity Hardware.
Winfree KN; Dominick G
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 Mar; 22(2):335-345. PubMed ID: 29505401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions.
Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study.
Katzan I; Schuster A; Kinzy T
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e14494. PubMed ID: 33464213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Validation Study of the Fitbit One in Daily Life Using Different Time Intervals.
Middelweerd A; VAN DER Ploeg HP; VAN Halteren A; Twisk JWR; Brug J; Te Velde SJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study?
O'Neill B; McDonough SM; Wilson JJ; Bradbury I; Hayes K; Kirk A; Kent L; Cosgrove D; Bradley JM; Tully MA
Respir Res; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.
Mikkelsen MK; Berg-Beckhoff G; Frederiksen P; Horgan G; O'Driscoll R; Palmeira AL; Scott SE; Stubbs J; Heitmann BL; Larsen SC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
