These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26910219)
1. Assessment of the Utility of PAX8 Immunohistochemical Stain in Diagnosing Endocervical Glandular Lesions. Liang L; Zheng W; Liu J; Liang SX Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 26910219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The utility of PAX8 and IMP3 immunohistochemical stains in the differential diagnosis of benign, premalignant, and malignant endocervical glandular lesions. Danialan R; Assaad M; Burghardt J; Newcomb P; Cartun RW; Mandavilli S Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 130(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 23618832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New developments in endocervical glandular lesions. McCluggage WG Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(1):138-60. PubMed ID: 23134447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PAX8 and PAX2 expression in endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ and high-grade squamous dysplasia. Shukla A; Thomas D; Roh MH Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Jan; 32(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 23202787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential patterns of PAX8, p16, and ER immunostains in mesonephric lesions and adenocarcinomas of the cervix. Goyal A; Yang B Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Nov; 33(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 25272301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PAX8 expression in uterine adenocarcinomas and mesonephric proliferations. Yemelyanova A; Gown AM; Wu LS; Holmes BJ; Ronnett BM; Vang R Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Sep; 33(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 25083965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas. McCluggage WG; Sumathi VP; McBride HA; Patterson A Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jan; 21(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11781517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. P16INK4a expression in undifferentiated carcinoma of the uterus does not exclude its endometrial origin. Saad RS; Mashhour M; Noftech-Mozes S; Ismiil N; Dubé V; Ghorab Z; Faragalla H; Khalifa MA Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 Jan; 31(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22123724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of p16 expression for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrial endometrioid and endocervical adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 201 cases. Yemelyanova A; Ji H; Shih IeM; Wang TL; Wu LS; Ronnett BM Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Oct; 33(10):1504-14. PubMed ID: 19623034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma. McCluggage WG; Oliva E; Herrington CS; McBride H; Young RH Histopathology; 2003 Aug; 43(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 12877729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement simulating primary endometrial carcinomas: utility of HPV DNA detection and immunohistochemical expression of p16 and hormone receptors to confirm the cervical origin of the corpus tumor. Yemelyanova A; Vang R; Seidman JD; Gravitt PE; Ronnett BM Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):914-24. PubMed ID: 19295407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ER-positive endocervical adenocarcinoma mimicking endometrioid adenocarcinoma in morphology and immunohistochemical profile: A case report of application of HPV RNAscope detection. Chen R; Qin P; Luo Q; Yang W; Tan X; Cai T; Jiang Q; Chen H Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(13):e24927. PubMed ID: 33787580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Lee S; Rose MS; Sahasrabuddhe VV; Zhao R; Duggan MA Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2017 Jul; 36(4):310-322. PubMed ID: 27801764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A panel of 3 markers including p16, ProExC, or HPV ISH is optimal for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas. Kong CS; Beck AH; Longacre TA Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jul; 34(7):915-26. PubMed ID: 20534993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemistry and HPV in situ hybridization in pathologic distinction between endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a comparative tissue microarray study of 76 tumors. Jones MW; Onisko A; Dabbs DJ; Elishaev E; Chiosea S; Bhargava R Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Feb; 23(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 23318908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PAX2 distinguishes benign mesonephric and mullerian glandular lesions of the cervix from endocervical adenocarcinoma, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Rabban JT; McAlhany S; Lerwill MF; Grenert JP; Zaloudek CJ Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Feb; 34(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20061933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. p16 immunoreactivity may assist in the distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma. McCluggage WG; Jenkins D Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jul; 22(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 12819388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mesonephric carcinosarcoma involving uterine cervix and vagina: report of 2 cases with immunohistochemical positivity For PAX2, PAX8, and GATA-3. Roma AA Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Nov; 33(6):624-9. PubMed ID: 25272303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The spectrum of cervical glandular neoplasia and issues in differential diagnosis. Loureiro J; Oliva E Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Apr; 138(4):453-83. PubMed ID: 24678677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unusual endocervical adenocarcinomas: an immunohistochemical analysis with molecular detection of human papillomavirus. Park KJ; Kiyokawa T; Soslow RA; Lamb CA; Oliva E; Zivanovic O; Juretzka MM; Pirog EC Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 May; 35(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 21490443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]