178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26910906)
1. Development of silica-encapsulated silver nanoparticles as contrast agents intended for dual-energy mammography.
Karunamuni R; Naha PC; Lau KC; Al-Zaki A; Popov AV; Delikatny EJ; Tsourkas A; Cormode DP; Maidment AD
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3301-9. PubMed ID: 26910906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gold silver alloy nanoparticles (GSAN): an imaging probe for breast cancer screening with dual-energy mammography or computed tomography.
Naha PC; Lau KC; Hsu JC; Hajfathalian M; Mian S; Chhour P; Uppuluri L; McDonald ES; Maidment AD; Cormode DP
Nanoscale; 2016 Jul; 8(28):13740-54. PubMed ID: 27412458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging.
Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Saab-Puong S; Iordache R; Muller S; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081907. PubMed ID: 23927321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring silver as a contrast agent for contrast-enhanced dual-energy X-ray breast imaging.
Karunamuni R; Tsourkas A; Maidment AD
Br J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 87(1041):20140081. PubMed ID: 24998157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.
Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An all-in-one nanoparticle (AION) contrast agent for breast cancer screening with DEM-CT-MRI-NIRF imaging.
Hsu JC; Naha PC; Lau KC; Chhour P; Hastings R; Moon BF; Stein JM; Witschey WRT; McDonald ES; Maidment ADA; Cormode DP
Nanoscale; 2018 Sep; 10(36):17236-17248. PubMed ID: 30191237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
Saito M
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study.
Knogler T; Homolka P; Hörnig M; Leithner R; Langs G; Waitzbauer M; Pinker-Domenig K; Leitner S; Helbich TH
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1575-81. PubMed ID: 26373754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography.
Baldelli P; Bravin A; Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Sarnelli A; Taibi A; Gambaccini M
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4233-51. PubMed ID: 16912379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility of iodine concentration map of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography for quantitative and tumor enhancement assessment.
Hwang YS; Cheung YC; Lin YY; Hsu HL; Tsai HY
Acta Radiol; 2018 Aug; 59(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 29117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cascaded systems analysis of anatomic noise in digital mammography and dual-energy digital mammography.
Tanguay J; Lalonde R; Bjarnason TA; Yang CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215002. PubMed ID: 31470440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Search for novel contrast materials in dual-energy x-ray breast imaging using theoretical modeling of contrast-to-noise ratio.
Karunamuni R; Maidment AD
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4311-24. PubMed ID: 25029534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis.
Lemacks MR; Kappadath SC; Shaw CC; Liu X; Whitman GJ
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1739-51. PubMed ID: 12201421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy subtraction mammography.
Asaga T; Masuzawa C; Yoshida A; Matsuura H
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):70-3. PubMed ID: 7734544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
