These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26911809)

  • 1. Modeling information flows in clinical decision support: key insights for enhancing system effectiveness.
    Medlock S; Wyatt JC; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH; Abu-Hanna A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Sep; 23(5):1001-6. PubMed ID: 26911809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of outpatient clinical decision support systems: a taxonomic description.
    Berlin A; Sorani M; Sim I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):578-81. PubMed ID: 15360878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.
    Liberati EG; Ruggiero F; Galuppo L; Gorli M; González-Lorenzo M; Maraldi M; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Scaratti G; Kwag KH; Vespignani R; Moja L
    Implement Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(1):113. PubMed ID: 28915822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive processes as integrative component for developing expert decision-making systems: a workflow centered framework.
    Jalote-Parmar A; Badke-Schaub P; Ali W; Samset E
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Feb; 43(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 19607934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the impact of user interface to the usability of a clinical decision support system.
    Chang YJ; Tsai CY; Yeh ML; Li YC
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():808. PubMed ID: 14728313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems.
    Berlin A; Sorani M; Sim I
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):656-67. PubMed ID: 16442854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CDSS-RM: a clinical decision support system reference model.
    Zikos D; DeLellis N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 30445910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for classifying decision support systems.
    Sim I; Berlin A
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():599-603. PubMed ID: 14728243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of computerized decision support on barriers to guideline implementation: a qualitative study in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.
    Goud R; van Engen-Verheul M; de Keizer NF; Bal R; Hasman A; Hellemans IM; Peek N
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jun; 79(6):430-7. PubMed ID: 20378396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social, organizational, and contextual characteristics of clinical decision support systems for intensive insulin therapy: a literature review and case study.
    Campion TR; Waitman LR; May AK; Ozdas A; Lorenzi NM; Gadd CS
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jan; 79(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 19815452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye tracking users of a visual diagnostic clinical decision support system to discover decision-making strategies and to inform user interface design.
    Haake AR; Pelz JB; Smagner J; Colombo D; Lindsay L; Papier A
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():962. PubMed ID: 18999126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A task-based support architecture for developing point-of-care clinical decision support systems for the emergency department.
    Wilk S; Michalowski W; O'Sullivan D; Farion K; Sayyad-Shirabad J; Kuziemsky C; Kukawka B
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 23232759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility.
    Marcos M; Maldonado JA; Martínez-Salvador B; Boscá D; Robles M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 23707417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Clinical Decision Support and Dashboard Technology to Improve Heart Team Efficiency and Accuracy in a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Program.
    Clarke S; Wilson ML; Terhaar M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():98-102. PubMed ID: 27332170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive process model of clinical information interaction in primary care: results of a "best-fit" framework synthesis.
    Veinot TC; Senteio CR; Hanauer D; Lowery JC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Jun; 25(6):746-758. PubMed ID: 29025114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers.
    Lugtenberg M; Weenink JW; van der Weijden T; Westert GP; Kool RB
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Oct; 15():82. PubMed ID: 26459233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and data synthesis.
    Dissanayake PI; Colicchio TK; Cimino JJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Jan; 27(1):159-174. PubMed ID: 31592534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting Learning and Reasoning Patterns in a CDSS for Dementia Investigation.
    Lindgren H; Yan C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():739-42. PubMed ID: 25991251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending contemporary decision support system designs to patient-oriented systems.
    Scott GC; Lenert LA
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1998; ():376-80. PubMed ID: 9929245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Dashboard Technology and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Improve Heart Team Efficiency and Accuracy: Review of the Literature.
    Clarke S; Wilson ML; Terhaar M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():364-6. PubMed ID: 27332223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.