These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26912124)
1. Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence. Kastner M; Antony J; Soobiah C; Straus SE; Tricco AC J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():43-9. PubMed ID: 26912124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. Tricco AC; Antony J; Soobiah C; Kastner M; Cogo E; MacDonald H; D'Souza J; Hui W; Straus SE J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():36-42. PubMed ID: 26891951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Knowledge synthesis methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative data: a scoping review reveals poor operationalization of the methodological steps. Tricco AC; Antony J; Soobiah C; Kastner M; MacDonald H; Cogo E; Lillie E; Tran J; Straus SE J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():29-35. PubMed ID: 26891948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. Kastner M; Tricco AC; Soobiah C; Lillie E; Perrier L; Horsley T; Welch V; Cogo E; Antony J; Straus SE BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():114. PubMed ID: 22862833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities. Young I; Waddell L; Sanchez J; Wilhelm B; McEwen SA; Rajić A Prev Vet Med; 2014 Mar; 113(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24485274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 7: Qualitative evidence synthesis for emerging themes in primary care research: Scoping review, meta-ethnography and rapid realist review. Moser A; Korstjens I Eur J Gen Pract; 2023 Oct; 29(1):2274467. PubMed ID: 37902265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence. Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations. Manchikanti L Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach. Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews. Thomas A; Lubarsky S; Durning SJ; Young ME Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 27782918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are we talking the same paradigm? Considering methodological choices in health education systematic review. Gordon M Med Teach; 2016 Jul; 38(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 27007488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 4: selecting analytic approaches. Viswanathan M; McPheeters ML; Murad MH; Butler ME; Devine EEB; Dyson MP; Guise JM; Kahwati LC; Miles JNV; Morton SC J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():28-36. PubMed ID: 28720515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]