370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26912221)
1. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth.
Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R
Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on water absorption by teeth restored with glass ionomer.
Hankins AD; Hatch RH; Benson JH; Blen BJ; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 24686970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites.
Do T; Church B; Veríssimo C; Hackmyer SP; Tantbirojn D; Simon JF; Versluis A
Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 25514074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cuspal flexure of composite-restored typodont teeth and correlation with polymerization shrinkage values.
Enochs T; Hill AE; Worley CE; Veríssimo C; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):152-160. PubMed ID: 29061285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between the amount of linear polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection.
Lee SY; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 16802645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shrinkage stress compensation in composite-restored teeth: relaxation or hygroscopic expansion?
Meriwether LA; Blen BJ; Benson JH; Hatch RH; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23537571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of hygroscopic expansion of resin filling on interfacial gap and sealing: a confocal microscopy study.
Rosales-Leal JI; Castillo-Salmerón RD; Molino-Serrano MA; González-Moreira H; Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Oct; 15(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 23560254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Attin T; Buchalla W; Kielbassa AM; Helwig E
Dent Mater; 1995 Nov; 11(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 8595836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
