These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26912405)

  • 1. Driver-centred vehicle automation: using network analysis for agent-based modelling of the driver in highly automated driving systems.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1442-1452. PubMed ID: 26912405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():389-95. PubMed ID: 26141907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire.
    Flemisch FO; Bengler K; Bubb H; Winner H; Bruder R
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 24559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To delegate or not to delegate: A review of control frameworks for autonomous cars.
    Richards D; Stedmon A
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():383-8. PubMed ID: 26521075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of highly automated driving on the self-perception of drivers in the context of Conduct-by-Wire.
    Kauer M; Franz B; Maier A; Bruder R
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):321-34. PubMed ID: 25343710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User acceptance of cooperative maneuver-based driving--a summary of three studies.
    Kauer M; Franz B; Schreiber M; Bruder R; Geyer S
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4258-64. PubMed ID: 22317374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preface to the Special Issue on Human Factors and Advanced Vehicle Automation: Of Benefits, Barriers, and Bridges to Safe and Effective Implementation.
    Horrey WJ; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 32119576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.
    Merat N; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 23156614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.
    Hancock PA; Kajaks T; Caird JK; Chignell MH; Mizobuchi S; Burns PC; Feng J; Fernie GR; Lavallière M; Noy IY; Redelmeier DA; Vrkljan BH
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):310-328. PubMed ID: 32022583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study.
    Banks VA; Eriksson A; O'Donoghue J; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():138-145. PubMed ID: 29409628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment selection in human-automation interaction studies: The Failure-GAM
    Grane C
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():182-192. PubMed ID: 28865841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who is responsible for automated driving? A macro-level insight into automated driving in the United Kingdom using the Risk Management Framework and Social Network Analysis.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102904. PubMed ID: 31422264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrasting models of driver behaviour in emergencies using retrospective verbalisations and network analysis.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1337-46. PubMed ID: 25643157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vigilance Decrement During On-Road Partially Automated Driving Across Four Systems.
    Biondi FN; McDonnell AS; Mahmoodzadeh M; Jajo N; Balakumar Balasingam ; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2179-2190. PubMed ID: 37496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.