BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26912802)

  • 21. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization and gene expression profiling in myeloma risk stratification.
    Hose D; Seckinger A; Jauch A; Rème T; Moreaux J; Bertsch U; Neben K; Klein B; Goldschmidt H
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011 Dec; 139 Suppl 2():84-9. PubMed ID: 22352188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An abnormal nonhyperdiploid karyotype is a significant adverse prognostic factor for multiple myeloma in the bortezomib era.
    Tan D; Teoh G; Lau LC; Lim A; Lim TH; Yap KC; Premalatha P; Lao ZT; Wee N; Choo C; Wee HC; Su S; Lee YS; Lee LH; Hwang W; Goh YT
    Am J Hematol; 2010 Oct; 85(10):752-6. PubMed ID: 20721886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chromosome 13 deletion and hypodiploidy on conventional cytogenetics are robust prognostic factors in Korean multiple myeloma patients: web-based multicenter registry study.
    Oh S; Koo DH; Kwon MJ; Kim K; Suh C; Min CK; Yoon SS; Shin HJ; Jo DY; Kwak JY; Kim JS; Sohn SK; Joo YD; Eom HS; Kim SH; Kim YS; Kim C; Mun YC; Kim H; Lee DS; Lee JH;
    Ann Hematol; 2014 Aug; 93(8):1353-61. PubMed ID: 24671365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incorporation of the bone marker carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen improves prognostic information of the International Staging System in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma.
    Jakob C; Sterz J; Liebisch P; Mieth M; Rademacher J; Goerke A; Heider U; Fleissner C; Kaiser M; von Metzler I; Müller C; Sezer O
    Leukemia; 2008 Sep; 22(9):1767-72. PubMed ID: 18580957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combination of Genetic Aberration With International Staging System Classification for Stratification of Asian Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.
    Byun JM; Kim D; Shin DY; Kim I; Koh Y; Yoon SS
    In Vivo; 2019; 33(2):611-619. PubMed ID: 30804149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cytogenetics and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS): Risk Stratification in Multiple myeloma - A Retrospective Study in Indian Population.
    Udupa CBK; Udupa KS; Pai A; Sherigar P
    Iran J Pathol; 2020; 15(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 32754213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can genome array screening replace FISH as a front-line test in multiple myeloma?
    Boneva T; Brazma D; Gancheva K; Howard-Reeves J; Raynov J; Grace C; Nacheva EP
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2014 Aug; 53(8):676-92. PubMed ID: 24757046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hyperhaploidy is a novel high-risk cytogenetic subgroup in multiple myeloma.
    Sawyer JR; Tian E; Shaughnessy JD; Epstein J; Swanson CM; Stangeby C; Hale CL; Parr L; Lynn M; Sammartino G; Lukacs JL; Stein C; Bailey C; Zangari M; Davies FE; Van Rhee F; Barlogie B; Morgan GJ
    Leukemia; 2017 Mar; 31(3):637-644. PubMed ID: 27694925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diffuse pattern of bone marrow involvement on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with high risk cytogenetics and poor outcome in newly diagnosed, symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma: a single center experience on 228 patients.
    Moulopoulos LA; Dimopoulos MA; Kastritis E; Christoulas D; Gkotzamanidou M; Roussou M; Koureas A; Migkou M; Gavriatopoulou M; Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E; Gika D; Koutoulidis V; Terpos E
    Am J Hematol; 2012 Sep; 87(9):861-4. PubMed ID: 22641455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chromosomal aberrations in 130 patients with multiple myeloma studied by interphase FISH: diagnostic and prognostic relevance.
    Schmidt-Wolf IG; Glasmacher A; Hahn-Ast C; Jüttner A; Schnurr T; Cremer F; Moehler T; Goldschmidt H; Busert B; Schubert R; Schwanitz G
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 May; 167(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16682281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A retrospective analysis of cytogenetic and clinical characteristics in patients with multiple myeloma.
    He J; Yang L; Meng X; Wei G; Wu W; Han X; Zheng G; Zheng W; Ye X; Shi J; Xie W; Zhang J; Huang H; Lin M; Cai Z
    Am J Med Sci; 2013 Feb; 345(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 22986611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 99mTc-sestamibi imaging and bone marrow karyotyping in the assessment of multiple myeloma and MGUS.
    Giovanella L; Taborelli M; Ceriani L; Zucca E; Cavalli F; Delaloye AB
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jun; 29(6):535-41. PubMed ID: 18458600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic studies of multiple myeloma reveal an association between X chromosome alterations and genomic profile complexity.
    Sticca T; Caberg JH; Wenric S; Poulet C; Herens C; Jamar M; Josse C; El Guendi S; Max S; Beguin Y; Gothot A; Caers J; Bours V
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2017 Jan; 56(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 27454822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cytogenetic classification in Korean multiple myeloma patients: prognostic significance of hyperdiploidy with 47-50 chromosomes and the number of structural abnormalities.
    Lim JH; Seo EJ; Park CJ; Jang S; Chi HS; Suh C; Kim H; Kim SR
    Eur J Haematol; 2014 Apr; 92(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 24372944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sequential analysis of chromosome aberrations in multiple myeloma during disease progression.
    Wu KL; Beverloo B; Velthuizen SJ; Sonneveld P
    Clin Lymphoma Myeloma; 2007 Jan; 7(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 17324335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Metaphase cytogenetics and plasma cell proliferation index for risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Mellors PW; Binder M; Ketterling RP; Greipp PT; Baughn LB; Peterson JF; Jevremovic D; Pearce KE; Buadi FK; Lacy MQ; Gertz MA; Dispenzieri A; Hayman SR; Kapoor P; Gonsalves WI; Hwa YL; Fonder A; Hobbs M; Kourelis T; Warsame R; Lust JA; Leung N; Go RS; Kyle RA; Rajkumar SV; Kumar SK
    Blood Adv; 2020 May; 4(10):2236-2244. PubMed ID: 32442300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High detection rate of clinically relevant genomic abnormalities in plasma cells enriched from patients with multiple myeloma.
    Stevens-Kroef M; Weghuis DO; Croockewit S; Derksen L; Hooijer J; Elidrissi-Zaynoun N; Siepman A; Simons A; Kessel AG
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2012 Nov; 51(11):997-1006. PubMed ID: 22833442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiple myeloma staging based on the combination of beta-2-microglobulin and albumin: the role of albumin in the model.
    Mihou D; Katodritou E; Zervas K
    Hematology; 2007 Dec; 12(6):527-31. PubMed ID: 17852450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Molecular cytogenetic analyses of patients with plasma cell myeloma in Tolna and Baranya counties in Hungary].
    Kosztolányi S; Horváth B; Hosnyánszki D; Kereskai L; Sziládi E; Jáksó P; Alizadeh H; Szuhai K; Alpár D; Kajtár B
    Orv Hetil; 2019 Jun; 160(24):944-951. PubMed ID: 31433233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cytogenetic and molecular aberrations of multiple myeloma patients: a single-center study in Singapore.
    Lim AS; Lim TH; See KH; Ng YJ; Tan YM; Choo NS; Lim SX; Yee Y; Lau LC; Tien SL; Sathish K; Tan DC
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(10):1872-7. PubMed ID: 23673102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.