These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913193)

  • 1. On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science.
    Walters WP; Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():. PubMed ID: 26913193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Entering new publication territory in chemoinformatics and chemical information science.
    Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():35. PubMed ID: 26097687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
    Benson PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers.
    Matsui A; Chen E; Wang Y; Ferrara E
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11999. PubMed ID: 34616596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. F1000Research: Tics welcomes you to 21st century biomedical publishing.
    Black KJ
    F1000Res; 2014; 3():272. PubMed ID: 25580234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding the chemical information science gateway.
    Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2017; 6():1764. PubMed ID: 29043072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ELIXIR channel in F1000Research.
    Blomberg N; Oliveira A; Mons B; Persson B; Jonassen I
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():. PubMed ID: 26913192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repositioning the Chemical Information Science Gateway.
    Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2019; 8():. PubMed ID: 31297184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A critical review of the "peer review" process].
    Alfonso F
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2010; 80(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 21169092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
    Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
    JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Dec; 31(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 25443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.