BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913438)

  • 1. [Molecular Markers of Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes--Review].
    Xu YY; Yu L
    Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 24(1):285-9. PubMed ID: 26913438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and genetic predictors of prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Bejar R
    Haematologica; 2014 Jun; 99(6):956-64. PubMed ID: 24881041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic models in myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Bejar R
    Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program; 2013; 2013():504-10. PubMed ID: 24319225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular Data and the IPSS-R: How Mutational Burden Can Affect Prognostication in MDS.
    Nazha A; Bejar R
    Curr Hematol Malig Rep; 2017 Oct; 12(5):461-467. PubMed ID: 28844082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular Testing in Myelodysplastic Syndromes for the Practicing Oncologist: Will the Progress Fulfill the Promise?
    Nazha A; Sekeres MA; Gore SD; Zeidan AM
    Oncologist; 2015 Sep; 20(9):1069-76. PubMed ID: 26194858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct mutation profile and prognostic relevance in patients with hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndromes (h-MDS).
    Yao CY; Hou HA; Lin TY; Lin CC; Chou WC; Tseng MH; Chiang YC; Liu MC; Liu CW; Kuo YY; Wu SJ; Liao XW; Lin CT; Ko BS; Chen CY; Hsu SC; Li CC; Huang SY; Yao M; Tang JL; Tsay W; Liu CY; Tien HF
    Oncotarget; 2016 Sep; 7(39):63177-63188. PubMed ID: 27527853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The multifaceted nature of myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical, molecular, and biological prognostic features.
    Greenberg PL
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2013 Jul; 11(7):877-84; quiz 885. PubMed ID: 23847221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A novel prognostic model incorporating genetic profiling for myelodysplastic syndromes].
    Nagata Y; Ogawa S
    Rinsho Ketsueki; 2017; 58(7):776-786. PubMed ID: 28781274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes].
    Nagata Y
    Rinsho Ketsueki; 2023; 64(5):355-368. PubMed ID: 37271526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes and its impact as prognostic factor].
    Borjas-Gutiérrez C; Domínguez-Cruz MD; González-García JR
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55(4):481-489. PubMed ID: 28591503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporation of mutations in five genes in the revised International Prognostic Scoring System can improve risk stratification in the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
    Hou HA; Tsai CH; Lin CC; Chou WC; Kuo YY; Liu CY; Tseng MH; Peng YL; Liu MC; Liu CW; Liao XW; Lin LI; Yao M; Tang JL; Tien HF
    Blood Cancer J; 2018 Apr; 8(4):39. PubMed ID: 29618722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutation status and burden can improve prognostic prediction of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Jiang L; Luo Y; Zhu S; Wang L; Ma L; Zhang H; Shen C; Yang W; Ren Y; Zhou X; Mei C; Ye L; Xu W; Yang H; Lu C; Jin J; Tong H
    Cancer Sci; 2020 Feb; 111(2):580-591. PubMed ID: 31804030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining gene variants with clinical characteristics improves outcome prediction in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Yu Y; Zhang T; Bao X; Wang Q; Zhang L; Hong Y; Zeng Z; Shen H; Wu D; Pan J; Liu H; Chen S; Sun A
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2020 Apr; 61(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 31842651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS?
    Kewan T; Bewersdorf JP; Gurnari C; Xie Z; Stahl M; Zeidan AM
    Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2023 Dec; 36(4):101517. PubMed ID: 38092484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic factors and risk models in myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Komrokji RS; Padron E; Lancet JE; List AF
    Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2013 Sep; 13 Suppl 2():S295-9. PubMed ID: 24290214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recurrent Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
    Wall M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1541():209-222. PubMed ID: 27910026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Insight Into the Biology, Risk Stratification, and Targeted Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
    Haider M; Duncavage EJ; Afaneh KF; Bejar R; List AF
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2017; 37():480-494. PubMed ID: 28561687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular genetics in myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Haferlach T
    Leuk Res; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1459-62. PubMed ID: 22986016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic relevance of morphological classification models for myelodysplastic syndromes in an era of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System.
    van Spronsen MF; Ossenkoppele GJ; Westers TM; van de Loosdrecht AA
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Mar; 56():10-20. PubMed ID: 26798967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolving role of genomic testing in assessing prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Steensma DP
    Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2017 Dec; 30(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 29156198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.