These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913624)

  • 41. Dimension-based attention in visual short-term memory.
    Pilling M; Barrett DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):740-9. PubMed ID: 26920437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Working memory units are all in your head: Factors that influence whether features or objects are the favored units.
    Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1404-16. PubMed ID: 25705873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.
    Bae GY; Olkkonen M; Allred SR; Wilson C; Flombaum JI
    J Vis; 2014 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 24715329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Verbal predicates foster conscious recollection but not familiarity of a task-irrelevant perceptual feature--an ERP study.
    Ecker UK; Arend AM; Bergström K; Zimmer HD
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):679-89. PubMed ID: 19443243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detection of small orientation changes and the precision of visual working memory.
    Salmela VR; Saarinen J
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():17-24. PubMed ID: 23085239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
    Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Combined effects of feature-based working memory and feature-based attention on the perception of visual motion direction.
    Mendoza D; Schneiderman M; Kaul C; Martinez-Trujillo J
    J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):11. PubMed ID: 21220539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Expecting the unexpected: Violation of expectation shifts strategies toward information exploration.
    Chen H; Yan N; Zhu P; Wyble B; Eitam B; Shen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):513-522. PubMed ID: 30816787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attentional guidance by irrelevant features depends on their successful encoding into working memory.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1182-1191. PubMed ID: 34694848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. To bind or not to bind: addressing the question of object representation in visual short-term memory.
    Wilson KE; Adamo M; Barense MD; Ferber S
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(8):14. PubMed ID: 22923725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatial location is filtered out of visual working memory representations when task irrelevant, just like other features.
    Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1391-1396. PubMed ID: 33728509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Object-based encoding in visual working memory: a life span study.
    Zhang Q; Shen M; Tang N; Zhao G; Gao Z
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 23962736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.
    Tas AC; Luck SJ; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1121-1138. PubMed ID: 26854532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Surface assignment modulates object formation for visual short-term memory.
    Kristjánsson A
    Perception; 2006; 35(7):865-81. PubMed ID: 16970197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stream specificity and asymmetries in feature binding and content-addressable access in visual encoding and memory.
    Huynh DL; Tripathy SP; Bedell HE; Ögmen H
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):14. PubMed ID: 26382005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes.
    Paul MA; Tipper SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 148(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 12541139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Integration of Distinct Objects in Visual Working Memory Depends on Strong Objecthood Cues Even for Different-Dimension Conjunctions.
    Balaban H; Luria R
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 May; 26(5):2093-104. PubMed ID: 25750258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The development of real-time stability supports visual working memory performance: Young children's feature binding can be improved through perceptual structure.
    Simmering VR; Wood CM
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Aug; 53(8):1474-1493. PubMed ID: 28627904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.