187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913839)
1. How proton pulse characteristics influence protoacoustic determination of proton-beam range: simulation studies.
Jones KC; Seghal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(6):2213-42. PubMed ID: 26913839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic time-of-flight for proton range verification in water.
Jones KC; Vander Stappen F; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5213. PubMed ID: 27587053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic-based proton range verification in heterogeneous tissue: simulation studies.
Jones KC; Nie W; Chu JCH; Turian JV; Kassaee A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025018. PubMed ID: 29176057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Theoretical detection threshold of the proton-acoustic range verification technique.
Ahmad M; Xiang L; Yousefi S; Xing L
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5735-44. PubMed ID: 26429247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single pulse protoacoustic range verification using a clinical synchrocyclotron.
Caron J; Gonzalez G; Pandey PK; Wang S; Prather K; Ahmad S; Xiang L; Chen Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36634371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Proton beam characterization by proton-induced acoustic emission: simulation studies.
Jones KC; Witztum A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6549-63. PubMed ID: 25322212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-stage ionoacoustic range verification leveraging Monte Carlo and acoustic simulations to stably account for tissue inhomogeneity and accelerator-specific time structure - A simulation study.
Patch SK; Hoff DEM; Webb TB; Sobotka LG; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):783-793. PubMed ID: 29159885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proton range verification in homogeneous materials through acoustic measurements.
Nie W; Jones KC; Petro S; Kassaee A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025036. PubMed ID: 29160776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy.
Assmann W; Kellnberger S; Reinhardt S; Lehrack S; Edlich A; Thirolf PG; Moser M; Dollinger G; Omar M; Ntziachristos V; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):567-74. PubMed ID: 25652477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of RACT for 3D dose measurement and range verification in a water phantom.
Alsanea F; Moskvin V; Stantz KM
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):937-46. PubMed ID: 25652506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental observation of acoustic emissions generated by a pulsed proton beam from a hospital-based clinical cyclotron.
Jones KC; Vander Stappen F; Bawiec CR; Janssens G; Lewin PA; Prieels D; Solberg TD; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7090-7. PubMed ID: 26632062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation studies of time reversal-based protoacoustic reconstruction for range and dose verification in proton therapy.
Yu Y; Li Z; Zhang D; Xing L; Peng H
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3649-3662. PubMed ID: 31199511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep learning-based protoacoustic signal denoising for proton range verification.
Wang J; Sohn JJ; Lei Y; Nie W; Zhou J; Avery S; Liu T; Yang X
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 May; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 37141867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spread-out Bragg peak proton FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron: Proof of concept and ion chamber characterization.
Darafsheh A; Hao Y; Zhao X; Zwart T; Wagner M; Evans T; Reynoso F; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4472-4484. PubMed ID: 34077590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the robustness of multilateration of ionoacoustic signals for localization of the Bragg peak at pre-clinical proton beam energies in water.
Kalunga R; Wieser HP; Dash P; Würl M; Riboldi M; Schreiber J; Assmann W; Parodi K; Lascaud J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(10):. PubMed ID: 37011627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-D Protoacoustic Imaging Through a Planar Ultrasound Array: A Simulation Workflow.
Samant P; Trevisi LM; Chen Y; Zwart T; Xiang L
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci; 2023 Jan; 7(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37588600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical note: Extraction of proton pencil beam energy spectrum from measured integral depth dose in a cyclotron proton beam system.
Yao W; Farr JB
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7504-7511. PubMed ID: 34609749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy.
Schellhammer SM; Gantz S; Lühr A; Oborn BM; Bussmann M; Hoffmann AL
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3429-3434. PubMed ID: 29763970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ionoacoustic application of an optical hydrophone to detect proton beam range in water.
Sueyasu S; Takayanagi T; Miyazaki K; Kuriyama Y; Ishi Y; Uesugi T; Unlu MB; Kudo N; Chen Y; Kasamatsu K; Fujii M; Kobayashi M; Rohringer W; Matsuura T
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2438-2449. PubMed ID: 36565440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Scanning Beam for Superficial Dose in Proton Therapy.
Moskvin VP; Estabrook NC; Cheng CW; Das IJ; Johnstone PA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):643-52. PubMed ID: 24945369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
