These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913869)

  • 1. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientists' views about communication objectives.
    Besley JC; Dudo A; Yuan S
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Aug; 27(6):708-730. PubMed ID: 28841818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists' willingness to choose specific tactics.
    Besley JC; O'Hara K; Dudo A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224039. PubMed ID: 31639153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.
    Valinciute A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.
    Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.
    Ho SS; Goh TJ; Chuah ASF
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275643. PubMed ID: 36197896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientists' political behaviors are not driven by individual-level government benefits.
    Zhang B; Mildenberger M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0230961. PubMed ID: 32374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
    Fiske ST; Dupree C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech acts and performances of scientific citizenship: Examining how scientists talk about therapeutic cloning.
    Marks NJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jul; 23(5):494-510. PubMed ID: 25414919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic communication as planned behavior for science and risk communication: A theory-based approach to studying communicator choice.
    Besley JC; Dudo A
    Risk Anal; 2022 Nov; 42(11):2584-2592. PubMed ID: 36116781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiologists' Public Engagement Views and Behaviors.
    Dudo A; Besley J; Kahlor LA; Koh H; Copple J; Yuan S
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2018; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 29904524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 'credibility paradox' in China's science communication: Views from scientific practitioners.
    Zhang JY
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Nov; 24(8):913-27. PubMed ID: 26307594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science communication at scientific societies.
    Braha J
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2017 Oct; 70():85-89. PubMed ID: 28627383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.