These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913933)
1. Does reactivating a witnessed memory increase its susceptibility to impairment by subsequent misinformation? Rindal EJ; DeFranco RM; Rich PR; Zaragoza MS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1544-1558. PubMed ID: 26913933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility. LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect. Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dark side of testing memory: repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility. Chan JC; Lapaglia JA J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):418-32. PubMed ID: 21859229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses. Chan JC; Langley MM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Children's eyewitness memory: repeating post-event misinformation reduces the distinctiveness of a witnessed event. Bright-Paul A; Jarrold C Memory; 2012; 20(8):818-35. PubMed ID: 22963045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility. Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False memories in music listening: exploring the misinformation effect and individual difference factors in auditory memory. Anglada-Tort M; Baker T; Müllensiefen D Memory; 2019 May; 27(5):612-627. PubMed ID: 30428762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why misinformation is reported: evidence from a warning and a source-monitoring task. Wyler H; Oswald ME Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1419-34. PubMed ID: 26754184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Undoing suggestive influence on memory: the reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect. Oeberst A; Blank H Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 22883683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction? Braun BE; Zaragoza MS; Chrobak QM; Ithisuphalap J Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 33290185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of self-esteem in the misinformation effect. Saunders J Memory; 2012; 20(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 22239231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrepancy detection in the retrieval-enhanced suggestibility paradigm. Butler BJ; Loftus EF Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 28899262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing increases suggestibility for narrative-based misinformation but reduces suggestibility for question-based misinformation. LaPaglia JA; Chan JC Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):593-606. PubMed ID: 24105926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval. Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging the reconstruction of true and false memories using sensory reactivation and the misinformation paradigms. Stark CE; Okado Y; Loftus EF Learn Mem; 2010 Oct; 17(10):485-8. PubMed ID: 20861170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]