These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26913935)

  • 1. Are nonadjacent collocations processed faster?
    Vilkaitė L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1632-1642. PubMed ID: 26913935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the Processing Advantage of Formulaic Language Persist in Its Nonadjacent Forms? Evidence from Eye Movements of Chinese Collocations.
    Jiang S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 Mar; 53(2):28. PubMed ID: 38472548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do different morphological forms of collocations show comparable processing facilitation?
    Vilkaitė-Lozdienė L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1328-1347. PubMed ID: 35389706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a processing advantage for verb-noun collocations in Chinese reading? Evidence from eye movements during reading.
    Li H; Wang X; Paterson KB; Zhang H; Li D
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1235735. PubMed ID: 37711319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of transposed-character distance in Chinese reading.
    Gu J; Zhou J; Bao Y; Liu J; Perea M; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):464-476. PubMed ID: 36037495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Eye-Tracking Study on the Processing of L2 Collocations: The Effect of Congruency, Proficiency, and Transparency.
    El-Dakhs DAS; Sonbul S; Masrai A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 Mar; 53(2):30. PubMed ID: 38492175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insights Into the Processing of Collocations During L2 English Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Li H; Paterson KB; Warrington KL; Wang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():845590. PubMed ID: 35432115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements.
    Olkoniemi H; Ranta H; Kaakinen JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):433-50. PubMed ID: 26371496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context.
    Țurcan A; Filik R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1867-1893. PubMed ID: 27504677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Set-shifting and the on-line processing of relative clauses in Parkinson's disease: results from a novel eye-tracking method.
    Hochstadt J
    Cortex; 2009 Sep; 45(8):991-1011. PubMed ID: 19473654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond decoding: phonological processing during silent reading in beginning readers.
    Blythe HI; Pagán A; Dodd M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1244-52. PubMed ID: 25528096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading homophone puns: Evidence from eye tracking.
    Jared D; Bainbridge S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 28252994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.
    Guerra E; Knoeferle P
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):535-52. PubMed ID: 25215930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of syntactic expectations on reading comprehension is malleable and strategic: An eye-tracking study of English dative alternation.
    Bridgwater E; Kyröläinen AJ; Kuperman V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 73(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 31081657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences.
    Carrol G; Conklin K
    Lang Speech; 2020 Mar; 63(1):95-122. PubMed ID: 30693821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of anomalous characters and small stroke omissions on eye movements during the reading of Chinese sentences.
    Liu P; Li W; Han B; Li X
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(11):1659-69. PubMed ID: 25105833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Losing track of time? Processing of time reference inflection in agrammatic and healthy speakers of German.
    Bos LS; Hanne S; Wartenburger I; Bastiaanse R
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():180-90. PubMed ID: 25447377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding mechanisms in transitive inferences: an eye-tracking study in Korean reading.
    Lee Y; Kwon Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Dec; 117(3):761-74. PubMed ID: 24665796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children.
    Pagán A; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):411-32. PubMed ID: 26348198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.