These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26914144)

  • 1. More Specific Signal Detection in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging by False Discovery Rate Control for Hierarchically Structured Systems of Hypotheses.
    Schildknecht K; Tabelow K; Dickhaus T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149016. PubMed ID: 26914144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wavelet thresholding with bayesian false discovery rate control.
    Tadesse MG; Ibrahim JG; Vannucci M; Gentleman R
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15737075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical testing and power analysis for brain-wide association study.
    Gong W; Wan L; Lu W; Ma L; Cheng F; Cheng W; Grünewald S; Feng J
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():15-30. PubMed ID: 29656107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the resolution of brain parcels on connectome-wide association studies in fMRI.
    Bellec P; Benhajali Y; Carbonell F; Dansereau C; Albouy G; Pelland M; Craddock C; Collignon O; Doyon J; Stip E; Orban P
    Neuroimage; 2015 Dec; 123():212-28. PubMed ID: 26241681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDR-Corrected Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis With Applications to Imaging Genomics.
    Gossmann A; Zille P; Calhoun V; Wang YP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1761-1774. PubMed ID: 29993802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple test procedures using an upper bound of the number of true hypotheses and their use for evaluating high-dimensional EEG data.
    Hemmelmann C; Ziegler A; Guiard V; Weiss S; Walther M; Vollandt R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 May; 170(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 18279970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.
    Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive control of the false discovery rate in voxel-based morphometry.
    Chen S; Wang C; Eberly LE; Caffo BS; Schwartz BS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jul; 30(7):2304-11. PubMed ID: 19034901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for partial conjunction hypotheses.
    Benjamini Y; Heller R
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18261164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate.
    Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical control of false discovery rate for phase locking measures of EEG synchrony.
    Singh AK; Phillips S
    Neuroimage; 2010 Mar; 50(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 20006711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False discovery rate control in magnetic resonance imaging studies via Markov random fields.
    Nguyen HD; McLachlan GJ; Cherbuin N; Janke AL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1735-48. PubMed ID: 24816549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.
    Genovese CR; Lazar NA; Nichols T
    Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):870-8. PubMed ID: 11906227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies.
    Reiss PT; Schwartzman A; Lu F; Huang L; Proal E
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1833-40. PubMed ID: 22842214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited.
    Eickhoff SB; Bzdok D; Laird AR; Kurth F; Fox PT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2349-61. PubMed ID: 21963913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voxel-wise information theoretic EEG-fMRI feature integration.
    Ostwald D; Porcaro C; Bagshaw AP
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1270-86. PubMed ID: 21167287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.