These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The relation among hearing loss, sensory cell loss and tuning characteristics in the chinchilla. Davis RI; Ahroon WA; Hamernik RP Hear Res; 1989 Aug; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 2793609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Remote masking in normal-hearing and noise-exposed chinchillas. McFadden SL; Henderson D; Quaranta A Audiol Neurootol; 1997; 2(3):128-38. PubMed ID: 9390827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evoked-response forward-masking functions in chinchillas with noise-induced permanent hearing loss. Arehole S; Salvi RJ; Saunders SS; Gratton MA Audiology; 1989; 28(2):92-110. PubMed ID: 2930367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory nerve fibre responses to salicylate revisited. Müller M; Klinke R; Arnold W; Oestreicher E Hear Res; 2003 Sep; 183(1-2):37-43. PubMed ID: 13679136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosing study on the effectiveness of salicylate/N-acetylcysteine for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss. Coleman J; Huang X; Liu J; Kopke R; Jackson R Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):159-65. PubMed ID: 20603572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis. Auerbach BD; Radziwon K; Salvi R Neuroscience; 2019 May; 407():93-107. PubMed ID: 30292765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evoked potential tone-on-tone masking patterns in the chinchilla. Robertson LF; Salvi RJ; Poon M; Powers NL Am J Otol; 1990 Nov; 11(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 2285064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing loss due to combined effects of noise and sodium salicylate. Eddy LB; Morgan RJ; Carney HC ISA Trans; 1976; 15(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 977270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Threshold sensitivity and frequency selectivity measured with round window whole nerve action potentials in the awake, restrained chinchilla. Spagnoli SD; Saunders JC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Jan; 96(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 3118303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salicylate ototoxicity in the chinchilla: a behavioral and electron microscope study. Deer BC; Hunter-Duvar I J Otolaryngol; 1982 Aug; 11(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 7131637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla. Salvi RJ; Ahroon WA; Perry JW; Gunnarson AD; Henderson D Am J Otolaryngol; 1982; 3(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 7158705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency difference limens in normal and sensorineural hearing impaired chinchillas. Prosen CA; Halpern DL; Dallos P J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1302-13. PubMed ID: 2708672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the chinchilla pinna and ear canal in electrophysiological measures of hearing thresholds. Murphy WJ; Davis RR J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1951-6. PubMed ID: 9566318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig. Brown CJ; Abbas PJ Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):193-204. PubMed ID: 3558128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outer hair cell activity is not required for the generation of the forward masking curve. Duan ML; Canlon B Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(6):309-19. PubMed ID: 9390811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]