These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26915010)

  • 1. Clinical Application of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Parikh V; Agnihotri K; Kadavath S; Patel NJ; Abbott JD
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2016 Apr; 18(4):32. PubMed ID: 26915010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Coronary artery disease diagnostic with fractional flow reserve].
    Trana C; Muller O; Eeckhout E
    Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(297):1182-8. PubMed ID: 21717690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy based on gray-zone fractional flow reserve in stable angina patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (COMFORTABLE prospective study): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kitabata H; Kubo T; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Hayashi Y; Komukai K; Sougawa H; Kimura K; Gohda M; Hashizume T; Obana M; Maeda K; Yamaguchi J; Akasaka T
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30691507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts.
    Di Serafino L; De Bruyne B; Mangiacapra F; Bartunek J; Agostoni P; Vanderheyden M; Scognamiglio G; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; Barbato E
    Am Heart J; 2013 Jul; 166(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23816029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
    Tonino PA; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Oldroyd KG; Leesar MA; Ver Lee PN; Maccarthy PA; Van't Veer M; Pijls NH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(25):2816-21. PubMed ID: 20579537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
    Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term outcome of intravascular ultrasound application in patients with moderate coronary lesions and grey-zone fractional flow reserve.
    Li L; Li B; Xie H; Zhai CJ; Liu QW; Zhang HZ; Cui LQ
    Coron Artery Dis; 2016 May; 27(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26807621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
    Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiology over Angiography to Determine Lesion Severity: the FAME Trials.
    Parikh RV; Fearon WF
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2020 Oct; 9(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 32921365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry.
    Van Belle E; Rioufol G; Pouillot C; Cuisset T; Bougrini K; Teiger E; Champagne S; Belle L; Barreau D; Hanssen M; Besnard C; Dauphin R; Dallongeville J; El Hahi Y; Sideris G; Bretelle C; Lhoest N; Barnay P; Leborgne L; Dupouy P;
    Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 24255062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.
    Kobayashi Y; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yang HM; Lim HS; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 204():206-10. PubMed ID: 26670174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    van Nunen LX; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Baumbach A; Engstrøm T; Klauss V; MacCarthy PA; Manoharan G; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; Van't Veer M; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH;
    Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10006):1853-60. PubMed ID: 26333474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?
    Ferguson TB; Chen C; Babb JD; Efird JT; Daggubati R; Cahill JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 146(4):824-835.e1. PubMed ID: 23915918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for intermediate coronary artery disease guided by intravascular ultrasound or fractional flow reserve].
    Zuo H; Liu Q; Zhang Z; Wang L; Weng J; Wei Y; Luo X; Chen Q; Cao Q
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 May; 34(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 24849441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The present day potential role of fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Casselman F; Van der Merwe J; Ferrara A; Barbato E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):926-32. PubMed ID: 26806476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Ojha CP; Ibrahim A; Paul TK; Mulukutla V; Nagarajarao HS
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2020 Feb; 22(4):17. PubMed ID: 32036467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.
    Kim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Tremmel JA; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1037-42. PubMed ID: 23078733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.