These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision. Wismeijer DA; Gegenfurtner KR; Drewing K Front Integr Neurosci; 2012; 6():105. PubMed ID: 23181012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch. Helbig HB; Ernst MO Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 179(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 17225091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Luminance edge is a cue for glossiness perception based on low-luminance specular components. Kiyokawa H; Tashiro T; Yamauchi Y; Nagai T J Vis; 2019 Oct; 19(12):5. PubMed ID: 31613954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generative constraints on image cues for perceived gloss. Marlow PJ; Anderson BL J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 24297776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceived glossiness in high dynamic range scenes. Doerschner K; Maloney LT; Boyaci H J Vis; 2010; 10(9):11. PubMed ID: 20936748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Remote effects of highlights on gloss perception. Berzhanskaya J; Swaminathan G; Beck J; Mingolla E Perception; 2005; 34(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 15991693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Look but don't touch: Visual cues to surface structure drive somatosensory cortex. Sun HC; Welchman AE; Chang DHF; Di Luca M Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():353-361. PubMed ID: 26778128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of visual and haptic cues in children's discrimination learning. Etaugh C; Kelliher R; Osborne B; Rose M J Genet Psychol; 1981 Mar; 138(1st Half):75-9. PubMed ID: 7217924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light source distances and illuminances on the gloss perception of papers. Zhu X; Inoue S; Sato H; Mizokami Y J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Jun; 39(6):B28-B38. PubMed ID: 36215525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential processing of binocular and monocular gloss cues in human visual cortex. Sun HC; Di Luca M; Ban H; Muryy A; Fleming RW; Welchman AE J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jun; 115(6):2779-90. PubMed ID: 26912596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Friction sensing mechanisms for perception and motor control: passive touch without sliding may not provide perceivable frictional information. Khamis H; Afzal HMN; Sanchez J; Vickery R; Wiertlewski M; Redmond SJ; Birznieks I J Neurophysiol; 2021 Mar; 125(3):809-823. PubMed ID: 33439786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent. Phillips F; Egan EJ; Perry BN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 19691944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Norman JF; Norman HF; Clayton AM; Lianekhammy J; Zielke G Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 15129753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface gloss and color perception of 3D objects. Xiao B; Brainard DH Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):371-85. PubMed ID: 18598406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical correlates of perceived gloss in natural images. Wiebel CB; Toscani M; Gegenfurtner KR Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt B):175-87. PubMed ID: 25937518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The perception of gloss: a review. Chadwick AC; Kentridge RW Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109():221-35. PubMed ID: 25448119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]