These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26915657)

  • 1. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
    Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of appraisal as perceived by general practitioners.
    Mugweni K; Kibble S; Conlon M
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 22413660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Annual trainer peer-review: impact on educational practice and sense of community.
    Sneddon A; MacVicar R
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 26954236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
    Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GP appraisal: an evaluation of generational differences on the utility of GP appraisal.
    Hopayian K; Sherifi J
    Educ Prim Care; 2020 Nov; 31(6):371-376. PubMed ID: 32862790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits of appraisal.
    Scallan S; Locke R
    Educ Prim Care; 2012 Sep; 23(5):369-70. PubMed ID: 23182105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
    Finlay K; McLaren S
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lessons for revalidation: a case report of an external review for quality assurance of deanery appraisal systems for general practitioners.
    MacLeod S; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 22413663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing of revalidation proposals: key findings from the pathfinder pilots.
    Ball K; Lyons N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):361-3. PubMed ID: 22413654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical appraisal and revalidation: can it improve patient care?
    Caesar S; Locke R; Scallan S
    Educ Prim Care; 2013 Sep; 24(6):398-400. PubMed ID: 24196594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revalidation: administrative burden or golden opportunity?
    Lyons N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):359-60. PubMed ID: 22413653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What do GP educators perceive to be the opportunities and challenges of introducing revalidation?
    Agius S; Baron R; Lewis B; Hayden J
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):386-92. PubMed ID: 22413659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance of appraisal summaries.
    Harding M; Freedman J; Powell C; Brownfield M; Gilbert D; Davies R; Brittan R; Poulton C; Kittle S
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Aug; 63(613):403. PubMed ID: 23972169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revalidation for educators: status box, status quo, and status maintenance.
    Peile E
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):357-8. PubMed ID: 22413652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
    Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appraisal information needs of newly qualified GPs.
    Keely J
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):430-2. PubMed ID: 22413667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.