These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26916010)

  • 21. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detecting lane departures from steering wheel signal.
    Sandström M; Lampsijärvi E; Holmström A; Maconi G; Ahmadzai S; Meriläinen A; Hæggström E; Forsman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):272-278. PubMed ID: 27988449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of risk expectation on haptically cued corrective manoeuvres during near lane departure.
    Deroo M; Hoc JM; Mars F
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(4):465-75. PubMed ID: 22423678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Car Gestures - Advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles.
    Maag C; Schneider N; Lübbeke T; Weisswange TH; Goerick C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():143-53. PubMed ID: 26264518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perfect timing: urgency, not driving situations, influence the best timing to activate warnings.
    Werneke J; Kleen A; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2014 Mar; 56(2):249-59. PubMed ID: 24689246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A mathematical model for predicting lane changes using the steering wheel angle.
    Schmidt K; Beggiato M; Hoffmann KH; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():85-90. PubMed ID: 24913491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
    Roozendaal J; Johansson E; Winter J; Abbink D; Petermeijer S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1380-1395. PubMed ID: 32551951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing effectiveness of various auditory warning signals in maintaining drivers' attention in virtual reality-based driving environments.
    Lin CT; Chiu TT; Huang TY; Chao CF; Liang WC; Hsu SH; Ko LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):825-35. PubMed ID: 19725318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
    Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid drivers.
    Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 15359683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Das A; Ghasemzadeh A; Ahmed MM
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():71-80. PubMed ID: 30876522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How to present collision warnings at intersections?--a comparison of different approaches.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 52():91-9. PubMed ID: 23305968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Driving Performance Evaluation of Shuttle Buses: A Case Study of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge.
    Lv M; Shao X; Li C; Chen F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vision-based lane departure warning framework.
    Em PP; Hossen J; Fitrian I; Wong EK
    Heliyon; 2019 Aug; 5(8):e02169. PubMed ID: 31440587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design and evaluation of steering protection for avoiding collisions during a lane change.
    Itoh M; Inagaki T
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):361-73. PubMed ID: 24206200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multi-parameter prediction of drivers' lane-changing behaviour with neural network model.
    Peng J; Guo Y; Fu R; Yuan W; Wang C
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Sep; 50():207-17. PubMed ID: 25959336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.