231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26916072)
1. Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer.
Stålhammar G; Fuentes Martinez N; Lippert M; Tobin NP; Mølholm I; Kis L; Rosin G; Rantalainen M; Pedersen L; Bergh J; Grunkin M; Hartman J
Mod Pathol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 26916072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots is superior to both manual Ki67 and mitotic counts in breast cancer.
Stålhammar G; Robertson S; Wedlund L; Lippert M; Rantalainen M; Bergh J; Hartman J
Histopathology; 2018 May; 72(6):974-989. PubMed ID: 29220095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers.
Bastien RR; Rodríguez-Lescure Á; Ebbert MT; Prat A; Munárriz B; Rowe L; Miller P; Ruiz-Borrego M; Anderson D; Lyons B; Álvarez I; Dowell T; Wall D; Seguí MÁ; Barley L; Boucher KM; Alba E; Pappas L; Davis CA; Aranda I; Fauron C; Stijleman IJ; Palacios J; Antón A; Carrasco E; Caballero R; Ellis MJ; Nielsen TO; Perou CM; Astill M; Bernard PS; Martín M
BMC Med Genomics; 2012 Oct; 5():44. PubMed ID: 23035882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Ki67 expression for breast cancer subtype classification and prognosis in the Nurses' Health Study.
Healey MA; Hirko KA; Beck AH; Collins LC; Schnitt SJ; Eliassen AH; Holmes MD; Tamimi RM; Hazra A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):613-622. PubMed ID: 28791482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the added value of digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry in breast cancer in clinical practice? A study with multiple platforms.
Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
Histopathology; 2019 May; 74(6):917-924. PubMed ID: 30585668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between digital image analysis and visual assessment of immunohistochemical HER2 expression in breast cancer.
Jakobsen MR; Teerapakpinyo C; Shuangshoti S; Keelawat S
Pathol Res Pract; 2018 Dec; 214(12):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 30377025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated tumor identification and automated scoring minimizes pathologist involvement and provides new insights to key biomarkers in breast cancer.
Bankhead P; Fernández JA; McArt DG; Boyle DP; Li G; Loughrey MB; Irwin GW; Harkin DP; James JA; McQuaid S; Salto-Tellez M; Hamilton PW
Lab Invest; 2018 Jan; 98(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 29251737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immunohistochemical assessment of HER2 low breast cancer: interobserver reproducibility and correlation with digital image analysis.
Sun H; Kang EY; Chen H; Sweeney KJ; Suchko M; Wu Y; Wen J; Krishnamurthy S; Albarracin CT; Ding QQ; Foo WC; Sahin AA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; 205(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 38441847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry in gastric- and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a validation study on biopsies and surgical specimens.
Koopman T; de Bock GH; Buikema HJ; Smits MM; Louwen M; Hage M; Imholz ALT; van der Vegt B
Histopathology; 2018 Jan; 72(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 28746978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis.
Gándara-Cortes M; Vázquez-Boquete Á; Fernández-Rodríguez B; Viaño P; Ínsua D; Seoane-Seoane A; Gude F; Gallego R; Fraga M; Antúnez JR; Curiel T; Pérez-López E; García-Caballero T
Virchows Arch; 2018 Feb; 472(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 28825136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency of breast cancer subtypes among African American women in the AMBER consortium.
Allott EH; Geradts J; Cohen SM; Khoury T; Zirpoli GR; Bshara W; Davis W; Omilian A; Nair P; Ondracek RP; Cheng TD; Miller CR; Hwang H; Thorne LB; O'Connor S; Bethea TN; Bell ME; Hu Z; Li Y; Kirk EL; Sun X; Ruiz-Narvaez EA; Perou CM; Palmer JR; Olshan AF; Ambrosone CB; Troester MA
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):12. PubMed ID: 29409530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital image analysis and assisted reading of the HER2 score display reduced concordance: pitfalls in the categorisation of HER2-low breast cancer.
Sode M; Thagaard J; Eriksen JO; Laenkholm AV
Histopathology; 2023 May; 82(6):912-924. PubMed ID: 36737248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance of Immunohistochemistry-Based and Gene Expression-Based Subtyping in Breast Cancer.
Holm J; Yu NY; Johansson A; Ploner A; Hall P; Lindström LS; Czene K
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33442660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer.
Dawe M; Shi W; Liu TY; Lajkosz K; Shibahara Y; Gopal NEK; Geread R; Mirjahanmardi S; Wei CX; Butt S; Abdalla M; Manolescu S; Liang SB; Chadwick D; Roehrl MHA; McKee TD; Adeoye A; McCready D; Khademi A; Liu FF; Fyles A; Done SJ
Lab Invest; 2024 May; 104(5):100341. PubMed ID: 38280634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: assessment of proliferative activity using automated Ki-67 immunostaining.
Dessauvagie B; Thomas A; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrink M; Budhavaram V; Kunjuraman B; Meehan K; Sterrett G; Harvey J
Pathology; 2019 Dec; 51(7):681-687. PubMed ID: 31630876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gene Expression Signatures and Immunohistochemical Subtypes Add Prognostic Value to Each Other in Breast Cancer Cohorts.
Lundberg A; Lindström LS; Harrell JC; Falato C; Carlson JW; Wright PK; Foukakis T; Perou CM; Czene K; Bergh J; Tobin NP
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Dec; 23(24):7512-7520. PubMed ID: 28972043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
