These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2691664)

  • 1. A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element.
    McGlumphy EA; Campagni WV; Peterson LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 2691664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis.
    Holmes DC; Grigsby WR; Goel VK; Keller JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 1299640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors.
    Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of osseointegrated implants for distal-extension prostheses.
    el Charkawi HG; el Wakad MT; Naser ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):469-72. PubMed ID: 2231458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in occlusal forces with a resilient internal implant shock absorber.
    Chapman RJ; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 2094655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress analysis of different osseointegrated implants supporting a distal extension prosthesis.
    el Charkawi HG; Zekry KA; el Wakad MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 7853259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval of the resilient element in an osseointegrated implant system.
    Ow RK; Ho KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 1403928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of resilient abutment components on measured strain using dynamic loading conditions.
    Morton D; Stanford CM; Aquilino SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 9656177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deflection of superstructure and stress concentrations in the IMZ implant system.
    Holmes DC; Haganman CR; Aquilino SA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 7916889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H; Schoen FJ
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 378283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite Element Analysis of Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture Attachment with Different Matrix Designs During Bilateral Loading.
    Shahmiri R; Das R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):e116-27. PubMed ID: 27632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of stress on a fixed partial denture with a blade-vent implant abutment.
    Takahashi N; Kitagami T; Komori T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Aug; 40(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 357711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Photoelastic model studies on environmental stress of functionally loaded endosseous dental implants].
    Häfer M; Knöfler W
    Stomatol DDR; 1985 Aug; 35(8):461-7. PubMed ID: 3914108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial denture.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Sadler JP; McKay ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 8809254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.