These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26916640)

  • 21. The cellblock token economy: token reinforcement procedures in a maximum security correctional institution for adult male felons.
    Milan MA; McKee JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1976; 9(3):253-75. PubMed ID: 977516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the value of token reinforcement for individuals with autism.
    Fiske KE; Isenhower RW; Bamond MJ; Delmolino L; Sloman KN; LaRue RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 25930718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Second-order schedules of token reinforcement with pigeons: implications for unit price.
    Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 16602378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of an escape contingency and a token economy to increase food acceptance.
    Kahng S; Boscoe JH; Byrne S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 14596575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The token economy: a decade later.
    Kazdin AE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1982; 15(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 6754677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The value of choice as a reinforcer for typically developing children.
    Ackerlund Brandt JA; Dozier CL; Juanico JF; Laudont CL; Mick BR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):344-62. PubMed ID: 25916749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.
    Taravella CC; Lerman DC; Contrucci SA; Roane HS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 10738960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Persistence of stereotypic behavior: examining the effects of external reinforcers.
    Ahearn WH; Clark KM; Gardenier NC; Chung BI; Dube WV
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 14768664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contingency management: schedule effects.
    Roll JM; Shoptaw S
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Sep; 144(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 16905197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of extinction, noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior as control procedures.
    Thompson RH; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Dozier CL; Samaha AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):221-38. PubMed ID: 12858986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Response acquisition under direct and indirect contingencies of reinforcement.
    Thompson RH; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10738948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Carryover effects of free reinforcement on children's work completion.
    Martens BK; Hilt AM; Needham LR; Sutterer JR; Panahon CJ; Lannie AL
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):560-77. PubMed ID: 12971128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response patterns.
    Penrod B; Wallace MD; Dyer EJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 18595282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects and side effects of DRO as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
    Cowdery GE; Iwata BA; Pace GM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 2074238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two measures of preference during forced-choice assessments.
    Derby KM; Wacker DP; Andelman M; Berg W; Drew J; Asmus J; Prouty AM; Laffey P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):345-6. PubMed ID: 7592152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relative efficacy of two token economy procedures for decreasing the disruptive classroom behavior of retarded children.
    Baer R; Ascione F; Casto G
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1977; 5(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 886090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of differential reinforcement of other behavior during dyadic instruction to reduce stereotyped behavior of autistic students.
    Haring TG; Breen CG; Pitts-Conway V; Gaylord-Ross R
    Am J Ment Defic; 1986 May; 90(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 3717225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Lindberg JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):419-35. PubMed ID: 10641298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A preliminary analysis of adaptive responding under open and closed economies.
    Roane HS; Call NA; Falcomata TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):335-48. PubMed ID: 16270843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.