BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26918471)

  • 1. Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lindner D; Schlothofer-Schumann K; Kern BC; Marx O; Müns A; Meixensberger J
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):175-183. PubMed ID: 26918471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skull Reconstruction Using a Custom-Made, Three-Dimensional-Printed, Hydroxyapatite-Titanium Cranioplasty Implant: Largest Single-Center U.S. Experience.
    Sorek S; Miller A; Griepp D; Moawad S; Zanzerkia R; Rahme R
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1387-e1394. PubMed ID: 36115561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
    Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Titanium Mesh and Custom Implants for Cranioplasty.
    Rosinski CL; Patel S; Geever B; Chiu RG; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E15-E22. PubMed ID: 31529096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years.
    Ganau M; Cebula H; Fricia M; Zaed I; Todeschi J; Scibilia A; Gallinaro P; Coca A; Chaussemy D; Ollivier I; Ligarotti GKI; des Neiges Santin M; Proust F; Chibbaro S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 74():98-103. PubMed ID: 32033859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty.
    Honeybul S; Morrison DA; Ho KM; Lind CR; Geelhoed E
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 26991387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term follow-up of custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty in adult patients: a multicenter European study. Can we trust self-reported complications?
    Zaed I; Rossini Z; Faedo F; Fontanella MM; Cardia A; Servadei F
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2022 Aug; 66(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 32989979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents.
    Williams L; Fan K; Bentley R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 44(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27174495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of titanium mesh cranioplasty and polyetheretherketone cranioplasty: protocol for a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.
    Yang J; Sun T; Yuan Y; Li X; Yu H; Guan J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033997. PubMed ID: 31796495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite or acrylic is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and infection-associated explantation.
    Millward CP; Doherty JA; Mustafa MA; Humphries TJ; Islim AI; Richardson GE; Clynch AL; Gillespie CS; Keshwara SM; Kolamunnage-Dona R; Brodbelt AR; Jenkinson MD; Duncan C; Sinha A; McMahon CJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 36(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 35608052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcome and osteointegration.
    Spennato P; Canella V; Aliberti F; Russo C; Ruggiero C; Nataloni A; Lombardo M; Cinalli G
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2020 Mar; 36(3):551-558. PubMed ID: 31786632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cranioplasty with Porous Hydroxyapatite Custom-Made Bone Flap: Results from a Multicenter Study Enrolling 149 Patients Over 15 Years.
    Fricia M; Nicolosi F; Ganau M; Cebula H; Todeschi J; Santin MDN; Nannavecchia B; Morselli C; Chibbaro S
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 121():160-165. PubMed ID: 30315976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
    Morselli C; Zaed I; Tropeano MP; Cataletti G; Iaccarino C; Rossini Z; Servadei F
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2019 Dec; 63(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 31599560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
    Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-Specific Titanium-Reinforced Calcium Phosphate Implant for the Repair and Healing of Complex Cranial Defects.
    Kihlström Burenstam Linder L; Birgersson U; Lundgren K; Illies C; Engstrand T
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e399-e407. PubMed ID: 30342265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
    Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Antibiotic Immersion of Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasty: A Multicentric Cohort Study.
    Amendola F; Vaienti L; Carbonaro R; Nataloni A; Barbanera A; Zingaretti N; Pier CP; Zanotti B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 33(5):1464-1468. PubMed ID: 35165242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Custom made bioceramic implants in complex and large cranial reconstruction: a two-year follow-up.
    Staffa G; Barbanera A; Faiola A; Fricia M; Limoni P; Mottaran R; Zanotti B; Stefini R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):e65-70. PubMed ID: 21640597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
    Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.