266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26918797)
1. Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing.
Jürgens T; Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Meddis R
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 26918797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.
Sabin AT; Souza PE
Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):94-107. PubMed ID: 24028890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Ewert SD; Oetting D
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.
Shekhawat GS; Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Stinear CM
Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):617-25. PubMed ID: 23859059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters.
Anderson M; Rallapalli V; Schoof T; Souza P; Arehart K
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):809-815. PubMed ID: 30052097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
Healy EW; Delfarah M; Vasko JL; Carter BL; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of compressive properties of the BioAid hearing aid algorithm.
Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S130-S138. PubMed ID: 28942716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
