These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26919409)

  • 1. Creative damage unleashes transcription.
    Calderwood SK
    Cell Cycle; 2016; 15(8):1021-2. PubMed ID: 26919409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring DNA Repair Consequences of ATM Signaling Using Simultaneous Fluorescent Readouts.
    Wiegmans A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1599():335-346. PubMed ID: 28477130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The emerging role of Polycomb repressors in the response to DNA damage.
    Vissers JH; van Lohuizen M; Citterio E
    J Cell Sci; 2012 Sep; 125(Pt 17):3939-48. PubMed ID: 23104738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Repair pathways in response to DNA double-strand breaks].
    Huang M; Miao ZH; Ding J
    Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan; 2007 Oct; 38(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 18232297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A game of musical chairs: Pro- and anti-resection factors compete for TOPBP1 binding after DNA damage.
    Shimada K; Gasser SM
    J Cell Biol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):535-537. PubMed ID: 28235945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histone code in the cross-talk during DNA damage signaling.
    Vaissière T; Herceg Z
    Cell Res; 2010 Feb; 20(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 20118964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BRG1 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by facilitating the replacement of RPA with RAD51.
    Qi W; Wang R; Chen H; Wang X; Xiao T; Boldogh I; Ba X; Han L; Zeng X
    J Cell Sci; 2015 Jan; 128(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 25395584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining.
    Howard SM; Yanez DA; Stark JM
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Jan; 11(1):e1004943. PubMed ID: 25629353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TOP2β-Dependent Nuclear DNA Damage Shapes Extracellular Growth Factor Responses via Dynamic AKT Phosphorylation to Control Virus Latency.
    Hu HL; Shiflett LA; Kobayashi M; Chao MV; Wilson AC; Mohr I; Huang TT
    Mol Cell; 2019 May; 74(3):466-480.e4. PubMed ID: 30930055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Annealing of Complementary DNA Sequences During Double-Strand Break Repair in
    Holsclaw JK; Sekelsky J
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):467-480. PubMed ID: 28258182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Telomere-Internal Double-Strand Breaks Are Repaired by Homologous Recombination and PARP1/Lig3-Dependent End-Joining.
    Doksani Y; de Lange T
    Cell Rep; 2016 Nov; 17(6):1646-1656. PubMed ID: 27806302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bridging of double-stranded breaks by the nonhomologous end-joining ligation complex is modulated by DNA end chemistry.
    Reid DA; Conlin MP; Yin Y; Chang HH; Watanabe G; Lieber MR; Ramsden DA; Rothenberg E
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1872-1878. PubMed ID: 27924007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phosphorylation of Ku dictates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway choice in S phase.
    Lee KJ; Saha J; Sun J; Fattah KR; Wang SC; Jakob B; Chi L; Wang SY; Taucher-Scholz G; Davis AJ; Chen DJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Feb; 44(4):1732-45. PubMed ID: 26712563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NHEJ Contributes to the Fast Repair of Radiation-induced DNA Double-strand Breaks at Late Prophase I Telomeres.
    Ahmed EA; Rosemann M; Scherthan H
    Health Phys; 2018 Jul; 115(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 29787435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. USP14 is a deubiquitinase for Ku70 and critical determinant of non-homologous end joining repair in autophagy and PTEN-deficient cells.
    Sharma A; Alswillah T; Kapoor I; Debjani P; Willard B; Summers MK; Gong Z; Almasan A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jan; 48(2):736-747. PubMed ID: 31740976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histone ubiquitination in the DNA damage response.
    Uckelmann M; Sixma TK
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2017 Aug; 56():92-101. PubMed ID: 28624371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of switch from ATM to ATR signaling at the sites of DNA damage induced by low and high LET radiation.
    Saha J; Wang M; Cucinotta FA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2013 Dec; 12(12):1143-51. PubMed ID: 24238855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Telomere maintenance by DNA damage response machinery].
    Sugimoto K
    Seikagaku; 2010 Dec; 82(12):1145-50. PubMed ID: 21348272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Basic Leucine Zipper Factor Attenuates Repair of Double-Stranded DNA Breaks via Nonhomologous End Joining.
    Rushing AW; Hoang K; Polakowski N; Lemasson I
    J Virol; 2018 Aug; 92(15):. PubMed ID: 29769340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probing the Telomere Damage Response.
    Rai R; Chang S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1587():133-138. PubMed ID: 28324505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.