These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
997 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26920465)
1. The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance. Recabal P; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Lee D; Laudone VP; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 26920465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance. Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value. Felker ER; Wu J; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Raman SS; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1421-1427. PubMed ID: 26674305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. Frye TP; George AK; Kilchevsky A; Maruf M; Siddiqui MM; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Han H; Parnes HL; Merino M; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood B; Pinto PA J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):640-646. PubMed ID: 27613356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care? Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies. Ouzzane A; Renard-Penna R; Marliere F; Mozer P; Olivier J; Barkatz J; Puech P; Villers A J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):350-6. PubMed ID: 25747105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial. Lovegrove CE; Miah S; El-Shater Bosaily A; Bott S; Brown L; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Freeman A; Henderson A; Hindley R; Kaplan R; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario D; Shergill I; Winkler M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 31335254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance. Tran GN; Leapman MS; Nguyen HG; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 27595378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma. Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance. Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies. Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate. Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Provides Independent Information on Adverse Pathology in the Setting of Combined Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy. Salmasi A; Said J; Shindel AW; Khoshnoodi P; Felker ER; Sisk AE; Grogan T; McCullough D; Bennett J; Bailey H; Lawrence HJ; Elashoff DA; Marks LS; Raman SS; Febbo PG; Reiter RE J Urol; 2018 Sep; 200(3):564-572. PubMed ID: 29524506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance. Ma TM; Tosoian JJ; Schaeffer EM; Landis P; Wolf S; Macura KJ; Epstein JI; Mamawala M; Carter HB Eur Urol; 2017 Feb; 71(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 27236496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer. Costa DN; Lotan Y; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn C; Liu A; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 26192254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Outcome Following Low Suspicion Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Benign Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer. Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Thomsen HS J Urol; 2017 Aug; 198(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 28235549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer. Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply? Hu JC; Chang E; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Macairan M; Lieu P; Huang J; Sonn G; Dorey FJ; Marks LS J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 24512956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]