249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26920570)
1. Editorial: Curiosity Versus Criticism in Scientific Publication.
Maltenfort M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 474(6):1353-5. PubMed ID: 26920570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Not the Last Word: Inigo Montoya and Statistical Significance.
Bernstein J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 474(6):1370-4. PubMed ID: 27052021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
J Physiol; 2012 Dec; 590(24):6251-4. PubMed ID: 23241920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.
Leopold SS; Porcher R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):929-932. PubMed ID: 28124297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Replicability, Reproducibility, and Fragility of Research Findings-Ultimately, Caveat Emptor.
Vetter TR; McGwin G; Pittet JF
Anesth Analg; 2016 Jul; 123(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 27183372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Writing a peer review: a primer for junior researchers.
Small HY; Eisner D
Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Aug; 115(10):e93-e95. PubMed ID: 31334806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
Evans RG; Su DF
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Documenting the methods history: would it improve the interpretability of studies?
Krumholz HM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):418-9. PubMed ID: 22811497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
Ioannidis JP
JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dispersed publication of editorial research.
Rosenberg J; Pommergaard HC; Vinther S; Burcharth J
Dan Med J; 2015 Feb; 62(2):. PubMed ID: 25634502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution in statistics:
Curran-Everett D
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Jun; 44(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 32412384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial: Threshold P Values in Orthopaedic Research-We Know the Problem. What is the Solution?
Leopold SS; Porcher R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Sep; 476(9):1689-1691. PubMed ID: 30024469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial: CORR
Leopold SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2551-2552. PubMed ID: 27761782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to restrict the use of p-values in Acta Orthopaedica.
Ranstam J
Acta Orthop; 2019 Feb; 90(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 30475088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores.
Inacio MC; Chen Y; Paxton EW; Namba RS; Kurtz SM; Cafri G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2722-6. PubMed ID: 25773902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
Lang T
Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
