1398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26920954)
21. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components.
Lim SJ; Lee YS; Lim BH; Park YS
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 26280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes at least 10 years after cemented PF® (Zimmer) total hip arthroplasty: 83 cases.
Aubault M; Druon J; Le Nail L; Rosset P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Jun; 99(4 Suppl):S235-9. PubMed ID: 23628004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term survivorship of cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components in patients > 75 years of age.
Levy BA; Berry DJ; Pagnano MW
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 10884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Results of the cemented Exeter femoral component in patients under the age of 40 : an update at ten to 20 years' follow-up.
Schmitz MW; Bronsema E; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 28148660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Fyda TM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak J; Johnston RC
Iowa Orthop J; 2002; 22():8-19. PubMed ID: 12180617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component.
Wysocki RW; Della Valle CJ; Shott S; Rosenberg AG; Berger RA; Galante JO
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63. PubMed ID: 19282138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.
Templeton JE; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1706-11. PubMed ID: 11701795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component.
Adelani MA; Mall NA; Nyazee H; Clohisy JC; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 24951737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Progressive radiolucent lines following the implantation of the cemented Rimfit acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty using the rimcutter technique: cause for concern?
Baker P; Rankin K; Naisby S; Agni N; Brewster N; Holland J
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 26920955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).
Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):874-80. PubMed ID: 22617914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-Term Survival of the Cemented Exeter Universal Stem in Patients 50 Years and Younger: An Update on 130 Hips.
Keeling P; Howell JR; Kassam AM; Sathu A; Timperley AJ; Hubble MJW; Wilson MJ; Whitehouse SL
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1042-1047. PubMed ID: 31882346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acetabular revision with morsellised allogenic bone graft and a cemented metal-backed component.
Wang JW; Fong CY; Su YS; Yu HN
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 16645102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomised controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked and contemporary annealed polyethylene after a minimal eight-year follow-up in total hip arthroplasty using cemented acetabular components.
Langlois J; Atlan F; Scemama C; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1458-62. PubMed ID: 26530645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes of Exeter cemented total hip arthroplasty in a county hospital: survivorship of eight hundred and ninety four hips with a minimum ten-year follow up.
Kristóf J; Gupta D; Szabó L; Bucsi L; Zahár Á
Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):729-735. PubMed ID: 37914902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Exeter Universal cemented femoral component.
Khatun F; Gill DF; Atrey A; Porteous M
Bone Joint J; 2020 Oct; 102-B(10):1319-1323. PubMed ID: 32993348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
