These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26921700)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients.
    Kim CW; Doerr TM; Luna IY; Joshua G; Shen SR; Fu X; Wu AM
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():228-235. PubMed ID: 26921700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
    Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices.
    McMordie JH; Schmidt KP; Gard AP; Gillis CC
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Feb; 86(2):E147-E155. PubMed ID: 31584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Alvi MA; Kurian SJ; Wahood W; Goyal A; Elder BD; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():596-606.e1. PubMed ID: 30954733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A feasibility research of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral incision and hybrid internal fixation for dural-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Xu J; Mao K; Wang Y; Xiao S; Li P; Mao K; Xiao B; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 24171350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Cages.
    Buckland AJ; Proctor DJ
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38274152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.
    Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Tian Y; Liu X
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.
    Khalifeh JM; Dibble CF; Stecher P; Dorward I; Hawasli AH; Ray WZ
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Oct; 19(5):518-529. PubMed ID: 32433773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expandable versus Static Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: 1-year Radiographic Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
    Woodward J; Koro L; Richards D; Keegan C; Fessler RD; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 34801752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shen X; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; Zhou X; He S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.