These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26922087)

  • 21. Measured gas emissions from four landfills in south africa and some implications for landfill design and methane recovery in semi-arid climates.
    Fourie AB; Morris JW
    Waste Manag Res; 2004 Dec; 22(6):440-53. PubMed ID: 15666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A correction in the CDM methodological tool for estimating methane emissions from solid waste disposal sites.
    Santos MM; van Elk AG; Romanel C
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():151-60. PubMed ID: 26363977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Harnessing landfill gas (LFG) for electricity: A strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Jakarta (Indonesia).
    Kurniawan TA; Liang X; Singh D; Othman MHD; Goh HH; Gikas P; Kern AO; Kusworo TD; Shoqeir JA
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113882. PubMed ID: 34638040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste dumpsites in Cameroon.
    Ngwabie NM; Wirlen YL; Yinda GS; VanderZaag AC
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():947-953. PubMed ID: 29501449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-criteria decision analysis of waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste management in Sultanate of Oman.
    Qazi WA; Abushammala MF; Azam MH
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):594-605. PubMed ID: 29921171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial variability of nitrous oxide and methane emissions from an MBT landfill in operation: strong N2O hotspots at the working face.
    Harborth P; Fuss R; Münnich K; Flessa H; Fricke K
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2099-107. PubMed ID: 23453435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stable isotope signatures for characterising the biological stability of landfilled municipal solid waste.
    Wimmer B; Hrad M; Huber-Humer M; Watzinger A; Wyhlidal S; Reichenauer TG
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2083-90. PubMed ID: 23540355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of landfill gas emissions and energy production potential in Tirupati Municipal solid waste disposal site by LandGEM mathematical model.
    Ramprasad C; Teja HC; Gowtham V; Vikas V
    MethodsX; 2022; 9():101869. PubMed ID: 36204474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Field assessment of semi-aerobic condition and the methane correction factor for the semi-aerobic landfills provided by IPCC guidelines.
    Jeong S; Nam A; Yi SM; Kim JY
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():197-203. PubMed ID: 25488731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling gaseous emissions and dispersion of two major greenhouse gases from landfill sites in arid hot environment.
    Elmi A; Al-Harbi M; Yassin MF; Al-Awadhi MM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(12):15424-15434. PubMed ID: 33236312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Low fraction of methane in landfill gas emissions in an industrial waste landfill containing incineration ash and gypsum board waste under anaerobic conditions.
    Ogata Y; Tanaka H; Sato M; Ishimori H; Endo K; Ishigaki T; Yamada M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Oct; 38(10):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 32564702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of low-organic waste at Danish landfills.
    Mou Z; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2251-9. PubMed ID: 25106120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.
    Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving leachate quality and optimizing CH
    Li W; Sun Y; Wang H; Wang YN
    Chemosphere; 2018 Oct; 209():839-847. PubMed ID: 30114732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of correction factors for landfill gas emission model suiting Indian condition to predict methane emission from landfills.
    Sil A; Kumar S; Wong JW
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 168():97-9. PubMed ID: 24685512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hotspot detection and spatial distribution of methane emissions from landfills by a surface probe method.
    Gonzalez-Valencia R; Magana-Rodriguez F; Cristóbal J; Thalasso F
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():299-305. PubMed ID: 26973281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling methane oxidation in landfill cover soils as indicator of functional stability with respect to gas management.
    Morris JWF; Caldwell MD; Obereiner JM; O'Donnell ST; Johnson TR; Abichou T
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jan; 69(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 30010508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Micrometeorological measurements of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at a municipal landfill.
    Lohila A; Laurila T; Tuovinen JP; Aurela M; Hatakka J; Thum T; Pihlatie M; Rinne J; Vesala T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(8):2717-22. PubMed ID: 17533829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abiotic decomposition of municipal solid waste under elevated temperature landfill conditions.
    Moutushi T; Tupsakhare SS; Castaldi MJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 823():153685. PubMed ID: 35134411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.