These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26922169)

  • 1. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX model: Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 64(4):538-549. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology.
    Ameye L; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Paladini D; Zhang J; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Savelli L; Veldman J; Testa AC; Amant F; Van Huffel S; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 22511559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.
    Sayasneh A; Wynants L; Preisler J; Kaijser J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Ghaem-Maghami S; Epstein E; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(12):2448-54. PubMed ID: 23674083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
    Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
    Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.
    Kaijser J; Bourne T; Valentin L; Sayasneh A; Van Holsbeke C; Vergote I; Testa AC; Franchi D; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 23065859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.
    Davenport C; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks JJ; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Champaneria R; Bayliss SE; Snell KI; Sundar S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD011964. PubMed ID: 35879201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of preoperative evaluation of postmenopausal ovarian tumors.
    Niemi RJ; Saarelainen SK; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    J Ovarian Res; 2017 Mar; 10(1):15. PubMed ID: 28288666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Naftalin J; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 24920435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.