373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26922481)
21. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R
Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cesarean Delivery in Adolescents.
Katz Eriksen JL; Melamed A; Clapp MA; Little SE; Zera C
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 29(5):443-447. PubMed ID: 26836505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand.
Phadungkiatwattana P; Tongsakul N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1375-9. PubMed ID: 21359844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Indications of primary cesarean deliveries in a regional teaching hospital and reasonable strategies for reducing them].
Zelli P; Boussat B; Wetzel A; Ronin C; Pons JC; Sergent F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):841-848. PubMed ID: 27593614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.
Little SE; Orav EJ; Robinson JN; Caughey AB; Jha AK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26721777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of physical activity during pregnancy on labor and delivery.
Watkins VY; O'Donnell CM; Perez M; Zhao P; England S; Carter EB; Kelly JC; Frolova A; Raghuraman N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):437.e1-437.e8. PubMed ID: 34081895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hospital-level variation in racial disparities in low-risk nulliparous cesarean delivery rates.
Main EK; Chang SC; Tucker CM; Sakowski C; Leonard SA; Rosenstein MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Dec; 5(12):101145. PubMed ID: 37648109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.
Hueston WJ; Applegate JA; Mansfield CJ; King DE; McClaflin RR
J Fam Pract; 1995 Apr; 40(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 7699347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Association of Expanded Access to a Collaborative Midwifery and Laborist Model With Cesarean Delivery Rates.
Rosenstein MG; Nijagal M; Nakagawa S; Gregorich SE; Kuppermann M
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 126(4):716-723. PubMed ID: 26348175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Please exit safely: maternal and twin pair neonatal outcomes according to delivery mode when twin A is vertex
Hartley RS; Hitti J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 26940591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.
Aiken AR; Aiken CE; Alberry MS; Brockelsby JC; Scott JG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):355.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25446659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Length of second stage of labor and preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy.
Levine LD; Srinivas SK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):535.e1-535.e4. PubMed ID: 26529372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Racial and ethnic differences in primary, unscheduled cesarean deliveries among low-risk primiparous women at an academic medical center: a retrospective cohort study.
Edmonds JK; Yehezkel R; Liao X; Moore Simas TA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Sep; 13():168. PubMed ID: 24004573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?
Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):933-8. PubMed ID: 15467567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Epidural analgesia during labor: a retrospective cohort study on its effects on labour, delivery and neonatal outcome.
Hincz P; Podciechowskil L; Grzesiak M; Horzelski W; Wilczyflski J
Ginekol Pol; 2014 Dec; 85(12):923-8. PubMed ID: 25669061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.
Bloom SL; Leveno KJ; Spong CY; Gilbert S; Hauth JC; Landon MB; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 16816049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
