These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26922481)

  • 61. Inter-institutional Variation in Use of Caesarean Delivery for Labour Dystocia.
    Riddell CA; Hutcheon JA; Strumpf EC; Abenhaim HA; Kaufman JS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Nov; 39(11):988-995. PubMed ID: 28916125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.
    Obure R; Reid CN; Salemi JL; Rubio E; Louis J; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):684.e1-684.e9. PubMed ID: 37321284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
    Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A cross-sectional study exploring the incidence of and indications for second-stage cesarean delivery over three decades.
    Pearson GA; MacKenzie IZ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 138(3):340-346. PubMed ID: 28602033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A new index for obstetrics safety and quality of care: integrating cesarean delivery rates with maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Ramani S; Halpern TA; Akerman M; Ananth CV; Vintzileos AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 226(4):556.e1-556.e9. PubMed ID: 34634261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean section and forceps delivery rates.
    Echt M; Begneaud W; Montgomery D
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Jul; 45(7):557-61. PubMed ID: 10948466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
    Goyert GL; Bottoms SF; Treadwell MC; Nehra PC
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(11):706-9. PubMed ID: 2922015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Outcome in second- versus first-stage cesarean delivery in a teaching institution in eastern India.
    Seal SL; Kamilya G; Mukherji J; Bhattacharyya SK; De A; Hazra A
    Am J Perinatol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 20175041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
    Schmitz T; Carnavalet Cde C; Azria E; Lopez E; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 18310373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Emergency cesarean section rate between women with gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women.
    Boriboonhirunsarn D; Waiyanikorn R
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 26927251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The impact of stage of labor on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang L; Wang H; Jia L; Qing W; Li F; Zhou J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):596. PubMed ID: 33028253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Risk factors for cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery after successful external cephalic version.
    de Hundt M; Vlemmix F; Bais JM; de Groot CJ; Mol BW; Kok M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(12):2005-7. PubMed ID: 26333291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Parrish KM; Holt VL; Easterling TR; Connell FA; LoGerfo JP
    JAMA; 1994 Feb; 271(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 8295319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.
    Davis LG; Riedmann GL; Sapiro M; Minogue JP; Kazer RR
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8027851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.
    Joseph KS; Young DC; Dodds L; O'Connell CM; Allen VM; Chandra S; Allen AC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 14551010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.
    Kozhimannil KB; Arcaya MC; Subramanian SV
    PLoS Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):e1001745. PubMed ID: 25333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.