These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

732 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26923088)

  • 1. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
    Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Waller T; Herzog M; Thoma DS; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 32011015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials.
    Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11168266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
    Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
    Jung RE; Hälg GA; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19191793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Augmentation stability and early wound healing outcomes of guided bone regeneration in peri-implant dehiscence defects with L- and I-shaped soft block bone substitutes: A clinical and radiographic study.
    Jung EH; Jeong SN; Lee JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Nov; 32(11):1308-1317. PubMed ID: 34423887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix.
    Cho KS; Choi SH; Han KH; Chai JK; Wikesjö UM; Kim CK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Dec; 9(6):419-28. PubMed ID: 11429943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results.
    Benić GI; Jung RE; Siegenthaler DW; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 19302239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
    Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of a synthetic gel membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants: clinical and radiologic 1- and 3-year results.
    Ramel CF; Wismeijer DA; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 22442785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients.
    Bazrafshan N; Darby I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 23647237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of loading in regenerated bone in dehiscence defects following a combined approach of bone grafting and GBR.
    Zambon R; Mardas N; Horvath A; Petrie A; Dard M; Donos N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):591-601. PubMed ID: 22092957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate implant placement into posterior sockets with or without buccal bone dehiscence defects: A retrospective cohort study.
    Hu C; Gong T; Lin W; Yuan Q; Man Y
    J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():95-100. PubMed ID: 28739320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial.
    Siciliano VI; Salvi GE; Matarasso S; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 19281503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized-controlled clinical trial evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes after 3 and 5 years of dental implants placed in bone regenerated by means of GBR techniques with or without the addition of BMP-2.
    Jung RE; Windisch SI; Eggenschwiler AM; Thoma DS; Weber FE; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):660-6. PubMed ID: 19489935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study.
    Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 11432655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
    Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study.
    Moses O; Pitaru S; Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 15777331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel matrix derivative and bone healing after guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects around implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Casati MZ; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Caffesse RG; Sallum AW
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 12146539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.