These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26924890)

  • 1. Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field.
    Dimmock SG; Kouwenberg R; Mitchell OS; Peijnenburg K
    J Risk Uncertain; 2015 Dec; 51(3):219-244. PubMed ID: 26924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments.
    Chew SH; Li KK; Chark R; Zhong S
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2008; 20():179-201. PubMed ID: 19552309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambiguity preferences for health.
    Attema AE; Bleichrodt H; L'Haridon O
    Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1699-1716. PubMed ID: 29971896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging and loss decision making: increased risk aversion and decreased use of maximizing information, with correlated rationality and value maximization.
    Kurnianingsih YA; Sim SK; Chee MW; Mullette-Gillman OA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():280. PubMed ID: 26029092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision-making in Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Aversion to Ambiguity for Therapeutic Inertia among Neurologists (DIScUTIR MS).
    Saposnik G; Sempere AP; Prefasi D; Selchen D; Ruff CC; Maurino J; Tobler PN
    Front Neurol; 2017; 8():65. PubMed ID: 28298899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information gaps for risk and ambiguity.
    Golman R; Gurney N; Loewenstein G
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Jan; 128(1):86-103. PubMed ID: 32757571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative lifetime stressor exposure assessed by the STRAIN predicts economic ambiguity aversion.
    Raio CM; Lu BB; Grubb M; Shields GS; Slavich GM; Glimcher P
    Nat Commun; 2022 Mar; 13(1):1686. PubMed ID: 35354811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond lottery-evoked ambiguity aversion: The neural signature of the types and the sources of uncertainty.
    Fairley K; Vyrastekova J; Weitzel U; Sanfey AG
    Neuroimage; 2022 May; 251():119007. PubMed ID: 35182750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.
    Li R; Roberts RC; Huettel SA; Brannon EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():319-326. PubMed ID: 28359540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambiguity aversion in schizophrenia: An fMRI study of decision-making under risk and ambiguity.
    Fujino J; Hirose K; Tei S; Kawada R; Tsurumi K; Matsukawa N; Miyata J; Sugihara G; Yoshihara Y; Ideno T; Aso T; Takemura K; Fukuyama H; Murai T; Takahashi H
    Schizophr Res; 2016 Dec; 178(1-3):94-101. PubMed ID: 27623361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision-Making under Uncertainty: How Easterners and Westerners Think Differently.
    Guo W; Chen XR; Liu HC
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35447663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-Affirmation Reduces Uncertainty Aversion for Potential Gains.
    Weller JA; Vineyard J; Klein WMP
    J Appl Soc Psychol; 2022 May; 52(5):277-286. PubMed ID: 35937756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ambiguity and Conflict Aversion When Uncertainty Is in the Outcomes.
    Smithson M; Priest D; Shou Y; Newell BR
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():539. PubMed ID: 30984054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision Thresholds for Medical Tests Under Ambiguity Aversion.
    Sevim D; Felder S
    Front Health Serv; 2022; 2():825315. PubMed ID: 36925866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Acceptance of Mixed Gambles Is Sensitive to the Range of Gains and Losses Experienced, and "Estimates of Lambda (k) Are Not a Reliable Measure of Loss Aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2021)": Correction.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jan; 151(1):160. PubMed ID: 35238600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.
    Jia R; Furlong E; Gao S; Santos LR; Levy I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228782. PubMed ID: 32130214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data.
    Simonovic N; Taber JM; Klein WMP; Ferrer RA
    Health Expect; 2020 Jun; 23(3):603-613. PubMed ID: 32097530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes toward risk and ambiguity in patients with autism spectrum disorder.
    Fujino J; Tei S; Hashimoto RI; Itahashi T; Ohta H; Kanai C; Okada R; Kubota M; Nakamura M; Kato N; Takahashi H
    Mol Autism; 2017; 8():45. PubMed ID: 28824795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion.
    Buckert M; Schwieren C; Kudielka BM; Fiebach CJ
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():82. PubMed ID: 24834024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.