These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26926152)

  • 1. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
    DeVries L; Scheperle R; Bierer JA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels With Relatively Poor Electrode-Neuron Interfaces Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):961-973. PubMed ID: 31972772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    DeVries L; Arenberg JG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):571-587. PubMed ID: 29869047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108257. PubMed ID: 34020316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.
    Long CJ; Holden TA; McClelland GH; Parkinson WS; Shelton C; Kelsall DC; Smith ZM
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 24477546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Applications for Spread of Excitation Functions Obtained Via Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (eCAP).
    Berg KA; DeFreese AJ; Sisler-Dinwiddie AL; Labadie RF; Tawfik KO; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Aug; 45(7):790-797. PubMed ID: 38923968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA; Nye AD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relation between ECAP measurements and the effect of rate on behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    McKay CM; Smale N
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():62-70. PubMed ID: 28213133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions and HiResolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjects.
    Eisen MD; Franck KH
    Ear Hear; 2004 Dec; 25(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 15604914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.