These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2692634)

  • 1. Insert earphones for audiometry: applications, advantages, and limitations.
    Luks SB; Borton TE; Nolen BL
    Entechnology; 1989 Sep; ():21-2, 24, 28-30. PubMed ID: 2692634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of audiometric thresholds obtained with insert earphones when used by certified audiometric technicians.
    Bell-Lehmkuhler B; Meinke DK; Sedey A; Tuell C
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):59-68. PubMed ID: 19265255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insert earphone depth and the occlusion effect.
    Dean MS; Martin FN
    Am J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 9(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 11200189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coupling of earphones to human ears and to standard coupler.
    Cirić DG; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2096-107. PubMed ID: 17069307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring.
    Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison of Grason Stadler insert earphones and TDH-50P standard earphones.
    Blackwell KL; Oyler RF; Seyfried DN
    Ear Hear; 1991 Oct; 12(5):361-2. PubMed ID: 1783242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Earphones in audiometry. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council Working Group.
    Zwislocki J; Kruger B; Miller JD; Niemoeller AF; Shaw EA; Studebaker G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Apr; 83(4):1688-9. PubMed ID: 3372875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Extended high-frequency audiometry--reproducibility of two type of earphones].
    Schmuziger N; Gantenbein M; Smurzynski J; Bertoli S; Probst R
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():75S-76S. PubMed ID: 11141946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural attenuation using etymotic ER-3A insert earphones in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Peek BF
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 2307307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the type of acoustic transducer in pure-tone audiometry.
    Born NM; Marciano MDS; Mass SDC; Silva DPCD; Scharlach RC
    Codas; 2022; 34(3):e20210019. PubMed ID: 35019084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation of young normal-hearing thresholds measured using different audiometric earphones: implications for the acoustic coupler and the ear simulator.
    Lawton BW
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):444-51. PubMed ID: 16149239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on "Earphones in Audiometry" [Zwislocki et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1688-1689 (1988)].
    Killion MC; Villchur E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1775-9. PubMed ID: 2708692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.