These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1037 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26927366)

  • 41. Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Bavishi C; Sardar P; Chatterjee S; Khan AR; Shah A; Ather S; Lemos PA; Moreno P; Stone GW
    Am Heart J; 2017 Mar; 185():26-34. PubMed ID: 28267472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Yamamoto K; Shiomi H; Morimoto T; Miyazawa A; Watanabe H; Natsuaki M; Watanabe H; Yamaji K; Ohya M; Nakamura S; Mitomo S; Suwa S; Domei T; Tatsushima S; Ono K; Sakamoto H; Shimamura K; Shigetoshi M; Taniguchi R; Nishimoto Y; Okayama H; Matsuda K; Yokomatsu T; Muto M; Kawaguchi R; Kishi K; Hadase M; Fujita T; Nishida Y; Nishino M; Otake H; Suematsu N; Ajimi T; Tanabe K; Abe M; Hibi K; Kadota K; Ando K; Kimura T;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 May; 16(5):e012922. PubMed ID: 37192307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efficacy of biolimus A9-eluting stent for treatment of right coronary ostial lesion with intravascular ultrasound guidance: a multi-center registry.
    Nasu K; Oikawa Y; Habara M; Shirai S; Abe H; Kadotani M; Gotoh R; Hozawa H; Ota H; Suzuki T; Shibata Y; Tanabe M; Nakagawa Y; Serikawa T; Nagasaka S; Takeuchi Y; Fujimoto Y; Tamura H; Kobori Y; Yajima J; Aizawa T; Suzuki T;
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Oct; 33(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 28929334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial.
    Kang DY; Ahn JM; Park H; Lee PH; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Kim YH; Park SW; Kim SW; Hur SH; Cho YK; Lee CH; Hong SJ; Hong YJ; Yoon YW; Kim SJ; Bae JH; Oh JH; Park DW; Park SJ
    Am Heart J; 2020 Oct; 228():72-80. PubMed ID: 32871327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Intravascular ultrasound-guided systematic two-stent techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions and reduced late stent thrombosis.
    Chen SL; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Liu ZZ; Santoso T; Zhou YJ; Jiang TM; Wen SY; Kwan TW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 22899562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study.
    Wijns W; Shite J; Jones MR; Lee SW; Price MJ; Fabbiocchi F; Barbato E; Akasaka T; Bezerra H; Holmes D
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3346-55. PubMed ID: 26242713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Propensity-Matched Cohort of the Thrombectomy Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Alone Trial.
    Sheth TN; Kajander OA; Lavi S; Bhindi R; Cantor WJ; Cheema AN; Stankovic G; Niemelä K; Natarajan MK; Shestakovska O; Tittarelli R; Meeks B; Jolly SS
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e003414. PubMed ID: 27056766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Optical coherence tomography-versus intravascular ultrasound-guided stent expansion in calcified lesions.
    Kurogi K; Ishii M; Ikebe S; Kaichi R; Mori T; Komaki S; Yamamoto N; Yamanaga K; Arima Y; Yamamoto E; Kaikita K; Matsushita K; Tsujita K
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2022 Apr; 37(2):312-323. PubMed ID: 34097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study.
    Tian NL; Gami SK; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Liu ZZ; Lin S; Ge Z; Shan SJ; You W; Chen L; Zhang YJ; Mintz G; Chen SL
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Apr; 10(12):1409-17. PubMed ID: 25912391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Suboptimal stent deployment is associated with subacute stent thrombosis: optical coherence tomography insights from a multicenter matched study. From the CLI Foundation investigators: the CLI-THRO study.
    Prati F; Kodama T; Romagnoli E; Gatto L; Di Vito L; Ramazzotti V; Chisari A; Marco V; Cremonesi A; Parodi G; Albertucci M; Alfonso F
    Am Heart J; 2015 Feb; 169(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 25641534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Randomized Study.
    Kim BK; Shin DH; Hong MK; Park HS; Rha SW; Mintz GS; Kim JS; Kim JS; Lee SJ; Kim HY; Hong BK; Kang WC; Choi JH; Jang Y;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(7):e002592. PubMed ID: 26156151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Otake H; Kozuma K; Akasaka T
    J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 68(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 26763605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incidence, predictors, morphological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of stent edge dissections detected by optical coherence tomography.
    Chamié D; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Yamamoto H; Kanaya T; Stefano GT; Fujino Y; Mehanna E; Wang W; Abdul-Aziz A; Dias M; Simon DI; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):800-13. PubMed ID: 23871510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019.
    Machanahalli Balakrishna A; Ismayl M; Walters RW; Aboeata A; Gowda RM; Vallabhajosyula S; Goldsweig AM; Dahal K
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 47(9):101270. PubMed ID: 35640848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The ability of optical coherence tomography to monitor percutaneous coronary intervention: detailed comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawamori H; Shite J; Shinke T; Otake H; Sawada T; Kato H; Miyoshi N; Yoshino N; Kozuki A; Hariki H; Inoue T; Hirata K
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 22(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 21041851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).
    Meneveau N; Souteyrand G; Motreff P; Caussin C; Amabile N; Ohlmann P; Morel O; Lefrançois Y; Descotes-Genon V; Silvain J; Braik N; Chopard R; Chatot M; Ecarnot F; Tauzin H; Van Belle E; Belle L; Schiele F
    Circulation; 2016 Sep; 134(13):906-17. PubMed ID: 27573032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of an optical coherence tomography guided approach in acute coronary syndromes: A propensity matched analysis from the international FORMIDABLE-CARDIOGROUP IV and USZ registry.
    Iannaccone M; D'Ascenzo F; Frangieh AH; Niccoli G; Ugo F; Boccuzzi G; Bertaina M; Mancone M; Montefusco A; Amabile N; Sardella G; Motreff P; Toutouzas K; Colombo F; Garbo R; Biondi-Zoccai G; Tamburino C; Omedè P; Moretti C; D'amico M; Souteyrand G; Meieir P; Lüscher TF; Gaita F; Templin C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 90(2):E46-E52. PubMed ID: 28029210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients.
    Zhang Y; Farooq V; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bourantas CV; Tian N; Dong S; Li M; Yang S; Serruys PW; Chen SL
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):855-65. PubMed ID: 23171805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical impact of angiographically insignificant suboptimal poststent findings detected by optical coherence tomography after drug-eluting stent implantation.
    Cho JY; Kook H; Yu CW
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240860. PubMed ID: 33075066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.