BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

659 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26928002)

  • 1. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.
    Moberly AC; Bhat J; Shahin AJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 26655914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of Multiple-Talker Phonetic Identification Training in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller SE; Zhang Y; Nelson PB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 26609904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users.
    Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Schumann A; Serman M; Gefeller O; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential.
    Sharma A; Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell T; Nicol T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 7681392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants for continua varying in formant transition duration.
    Blankenship KG; Ohde RN; Won JH; Hedrick M
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Apr; 20(2):238-246. PubMed ID: 28000516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
    Turgeon C; Lazzouni L; Lepore F; Ellemberg D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds.
    Maiste AC; Wiens AS; Hunt MJ; Scherg M; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):68-90. PubMed ID: 7774771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: an auditory event-related potentials study.
    Henkin Y; Kileny PR; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18595188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time.
    Sharma A; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1078-83. PubMed ID: 10462812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation.
    Fu QJ; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 15952053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
    Hedrick MS; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.