These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26928069)

  • 21. Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately.
    Caulley L; Catalá-López F; Whelan J; Khoury M; Ferraro J; Cheng W; Husereau D; Altman DG; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():87-94. PubMed ID: 32184126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines.
    Brett J; Staniszewska S; Simera I; Seers K; Mockford C; Goodlad S; Altman D; Moher D; Barber R; Denegri S; Entwistle AR; Littlejohns P; Morris C; Suleman R; Thomas V; Tysall C
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e016948. PubMed ID: 29061613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review.
    Wang X; Chen Y; Yang N; Deng W; Wang Q; Li N; Yao L; Wei D; Chen G; Yang K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Sep; 15():74. PubMed ID: 26395179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs.
    Lohr KN
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Feb; 16(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 15020556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.
    Moher D
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 56(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19247756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Qualitative Research in Health Services Research - Discussion Paper, Part 3: Quality of Qualitative Research].
    Stamer M; Güthlin C; Holmberg C; Karbach U; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Dec; 77(12):966-75. PubMed ID: 26714312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using informatics-enabled quality improvement techniques to meet health record documentation requirements in radiology reports.
    Prevedello LM; Farkas C; Dufault A; Damiano M; Doubilet P; Khorasani R
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 23830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Informatics in radiology: Measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics.
    Rubin DL
    Radiographics; 2011 Oct; 31(6):1511-27. PubMed ID: 21997979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM; Beazoglou T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1070-6. PubMed ID: 15507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adding Value in Radiology Reporting.
    Goldberg-Stein S; Chernyak V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Sep; 16(9 Pt B):1292-1298. PubMed ID: 31492407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Publishing Health IT Evaluation Studies.
    Ammenwerth E; de Keizer NF
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():304-11. PubMed ID: 27198112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of clinical information on radiology reporting: A systematic review.
    Castillo C; Steffens T; Sim L; Caffery L
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Mar; 68(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 32870580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving the Quality of Quality Improvement Reporting: Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 Guidelines.
    Mueck KM; Putnam LR; Kao LS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 26791439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Harms M
    Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline.
    Kushner DC; Lucey LL;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17411755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reporting Guidelines and Checklists Improve the Reliability and Rigor of Research Reports.
    Abbott JH
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Mar; 46(3):130. PubMed ID: 26928734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.