100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26928614)
1. [Predictive value of breast imaging report and database system (BIRADS) to detect cancer in a reference regional hospital].
Bellolio E; Pineda V; Burgos ME; Iriarte MJ; Becker R; Araya JC; Villaseca M; Mardones N
Rev Med Chil; 2015 Dec; 143(12):1533-8. PubMed ID: 26928614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Scintimammography with 99mTC-MIBI in the clinical practice: repercussion on the clinical management of the patient].
Prats E; Razola P; Sainz JM; Tardín L; Andrés A; Abós MD; García F; Fernández J; Villavieja L; Banzo J
Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2007; 26(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 17524309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation and correlation of mammographically suspicious lesions with histopathology at Addington Hospital, Durban.
Cupido BD; Vawda F; Sabri A; Sikwila CT
S Afr Med J; 2013 Mar; 103(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 23547702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
Weigert J; Steenbergen S
Breast J; 2012; 18(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 23009208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Lacquement MA; Mitchell D; Hollingsworth AB
J Am Coll Surg; 1999 Jul; 189(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 10401738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.
Damases CN; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26514436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mammographic and ultrasonographic BIRADS classification and its correlation with histopathologic findings].
Acosta-Martínez M; Karchmer-Krivitzky S; Melgar-Barriga G; Molinar-Horcasitas ML; Garza-Arrieta J
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2016 Mar; 84(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 27424439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of tru-cut biopsy of breast lumps at University College Hospital, Ibadan.
Oluwasola AG; Adeoye AO; Afolabi AO; Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT; Salami A; Ajani MA; Ogundiran TO; Obajimi MO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2015 Jun; 44(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26937529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.
Taif S; Tufail F; Alnuaimi AS
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e250-8. PubMed ID: 24673798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience.
Rosen EL; Turkington TG; Soo MS; Baker JA; Coleman RE
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):527-34. PubMed ID: 15671006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The negative predictive value of breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions.
Dorrius MD; Pijnappel RM; Sijens PE; van der Weide MC; Oudkerk M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 21251784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound as a first-line imaging method.
Hille H; Vetter M; Hackelöer BJ
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Apr; 33(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 21877320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts.
Corsetti V; Ferrari A; Ghirardi M; Bergonzini R; Bellarosa S; Angelini O; Bani C; Ciatto S
Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 16683089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the mammographic report category according to BIRADS.
Hirunpat S; Tanomkiat W; Khojarern R; Arpakupakul N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Jan; 88(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 15960219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audit of mammography requests in Abakaliki, South-East Nigeria.
Eni UE; Ekwedigwe KC; Sunday-Adeoye I; Daniyan A; Isikhuemen ME
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 28270153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
Fiaschetti V; Salimbeni C; Gaspari E; Dembele GK; Bolacchi F; Cossu E; Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Simonetti G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3178-84. PubMed ID: 22417393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy of film/screen mammography. A three-year experience.
Warren DL; Stelling CB
J Ky Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 87(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 2723524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Downgrading BIRADS 3 to BIRADS 2 category using a computer-aided microcalcification analysis and risk assessment system for early breast cancer.
Giannakopoulou G; Spyrou GM; Antaraki A; Andreadis I; Koulocheri D; Zagouri F; Nonni A; Filippakis GM; Nikita KS; Ligomenides PA; Zografos GC
Comput Biol Med; 2010; 40(11-12):853-9. PubMed ID: 20950798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
